Best El Hierro Thread On GLP - Canary Islands - ACTIVITY HAS RETURNED - AGAIN!

When people said scientists were kicking the can down the road, i didn't realise they were being literal.

Good Gawwwwd! Look at Fuerteventura two helicorder charts!

[link to www.01.ign.es]

[link to www.01.ign.es]

they found the underwater crater

[link to earthquake-report.com]

Look at those frequency marks...on all levels! How can something maintain like that with no variance?

[link to www.01.ign.es]

i think there's a fault there, BUT something is interesting. when you compare that chart to Gran Canaria, those sharp red spikes seem to correspond to the yellow signal at Gran Canaria..

[link to www.01.ign.es]

what is that signal?

[link to www.01.ign.es]


11mm change in two days at Gomera


[link to www.01.ign.es]

9mm change in two days at Tenerife


[link to www.01.ign.es]

27mm change in two days at this location in Hierro


[link to www.01.ign.es]

14mm change in two days at this location in Hierro

[link to www.01.ign.es]

15mm change in two days at this location in Hierro, pausing for record high on deformation of 40mm


Holy Crap!!!

I could imagine there may be huge electrical discharges ionising the area, due to the shift of a lot of energie between rocks. A piezo like effect. The transmission of the heli signals is most likely wireless and prone to interferences like that.

Looks ok to me, but i think PSD is sometimes playing catch up or doesn't compute effectively until it has 24 hours data, or if it has missing data. I'd look at it again when the day is done.

only a few quakes have been felt anywhere. its like a swan - graceful above, and paddling like fuck underneath

Fuerteventura

[link to www.01.ign.es]

Anybody able to comment on the radiation absorption map? How is it that it all dissappears so rapidly? I mean dang...one day the planet is inundated at the poles and waves are reaching clear into the adjacent continents...and today it's all gone!

[link to www.swpc.noaa.gov]

Hope i can help. But i'm still learning. Generally absorption is from solar winds. When a CME passes, the dense wave usually pushes all material in space with it and creates a gap in behind the wave, similar to moving your hand through water or air creates a pocket in behind it.

That could be why after the CME reached earth, we can see a sudden drop off in absorption. Hope i explained well enough. This current simulation should help visualising what i'm trying to describe.

[link to www.swpc.noaa.gov]

Fuerteventura

[link to www.01.ign.es]

Looks to me like it may be flatlining and then all of the missing data is coming through compressed. Problem in transmission maybe.

Hope i can help. But i'm still learning. Generally absorption is from solar winds. When a CME passes, the dense wave usually pushes all material in space with it and creates a gap in behind the wave, similar to moving your hand through water or air creates a pocket in behind it.

That could be why after the CME reached earth, we can see a sudden drop off in absorption. Hope i explained well enough. This current simulation should help visualising what i'm trying to describe.

[link to www.swpc.noaa.gov]

Fair enough. I don't know why you would feel that way either, except that the accusation of such insistence should not have been fully directed at you. So i apologise.

In my opinion, that Fuerteventura data is clearly the result of a technical fault and i can see no purpose focusing on it, unless your interest is in the further degradation of the efforts of the IGN, which i feel is both unjust and a distraction.

If you want to follow it up, can see something i don't or just want to cover all bases, then i can genuinely say, good luck. I should perhaps keep my nose out of your business and maybe there is something to it that i missed. I just wouldn't want you running down a dead end street, that's all really.

Now, back to El Hierro?

Does it really do that? I'm trying to picture in my head how the graphs we're seeing could bunch up data. I've seen the machines go down multiple times in the past 3 months and I've never seen an accumulation occur like this after they come back online.

Are these somewhat real time? Or...are we getting a computer generated read out of what the true seismographs are getting?

It's not that I want to degrade IGN. It's that they seem to have conflicting info coming from their own scientists. Several times we'll see one resource quoting one IGN scientist, and then another resource will quote another IGN scientist. And, the stories end up conflicting with each other. RSOE actually pointed that out once before...I will try and look for the posts we've documented this in.

I want to get accurate info in this thread...and, I'm an investigator at heart :)