There is no such thing as ‘Palestine’ nor ‘Palestinian people’

I'm Blackfoot/French Canadian, born in Wa. Timeline; Washington= no name=1543 claimed by Spain=1579 claimed by England=1775 claimed by Spain again=1818 US and Britain agree to joint occupy=1823 Monroe Doctrine=1843 Great Migration=1871 - Indian Appropriations Act states that Indians are no longer considered sovereign nations but wards of the federal government.=1854 Walla Walla county formed.
1889 - Washington becomes the 42nd state.

So with this am I called a what? American, just because my ancestors didn't have a name for a country or they did and someone over wrote it? I'm an American Washatonian Oregonian? Hell I can even add the counties to this.

I live in Oregon now so that's why I threw that part in.. Stupid to go by history books and the bible. We know history books don't always tell the truth and the bible I won't go there. That in itself is supposedly re-re-re-re-written so many times through peoples interpretation.

So arguing over something unless you want to start with DNA and than be able to figure out from there exactly who is who...This argument can go any way. Palestinian can be a name such as Washatonian and Oregonian or it could actually be a tribe like the Blackfoot. Either way you all are loosing it..Just my 2cents..

So let's not get into the technicalities and just stay on the main point. According to OP, there were no Arabs in the land known as Palestine before the British announced they were going to give it away to the Jews, who were the main inhabitants of that area, and that the Arabs only came to the area to ruin the Jewish state.

One wonders where to begin in deconstructing this ridiculous assertion. Any reader of history would know what the OP is saying is blatantly false, but to those who are not so aware of the region's history, let's take a look at a few historical points:

1) Before the British took Palestine, the area was ruled by the Turks as part of the Ottoman empire. After the Ottomans defeat in World war 1, the areas they controlled were divided among the British and French according as set by the infamous Sykes–Picot agreement, and hence the British got Palestine.

During Ottoman times, Palestine was happily inhabited by many people of different ethnicity (religion, not race, is what officially distinguished people at that time). The majority living in Palestine were Muslims and Christians who spoke Arabic (and hence were Arab, since "Arab" as a term covers a cultural group defined by their language). It is absurd to suggest that a large patch of fertile land like Palestine, especially which holds extremely religious significance to Muslims and Christians, would be left alone solely to the Jews.

2) If OP's assertions were true, there would be no 1948 Arabs (Palestinians who stayed on the land despite Israeli attempts to kick them out). The majority of Palestinians fled their lands following Israelis massacres (such as Deir Yassin) and propaganda campaigns. If the Arabs came to Palestine specifically to ruin the Jewish state, then it would have made no sense for them to flee.


If you still insist on believing OP's lie that there were no Arabs in Palestine, then please explain this video:

You have a warped perception of what has been going on in the Palestinian region since 48. Paestinian "ARABS" have been forced out of their homes when many of them lived in these places for generations.

The real question is why are the zionists so obsessed with controlling this area?
wouldn't it have make much more sense that they seetled in some random state in america, whom came to their rescure in WW2, or simply go back to russia where they came from before seetlng in germany and all over europe. Why choice the middle east?

What good did they actually think would come out of that, there gotta be some agenda behind that decision, other than their own thousand year old self written propheties. All the misery that have come from this, to both their own and the muslims, let alone the trail this conflict have left all over the world. it doesn't make any sense.

And who are the people behind the zionist movement we always hear about on sites like this, how did they became so powerful that they pretty much control the whole western world, and how is it that noone actually know anything about them. Ask any random person at work if they know about the zionists and they will stare back with a blank look. I dunno what to think of it all.

so much of the worlds troubles have been breed by colonialism

And the homes they lived in were built on land stolen from Jews. They made bad decisions betting that the owners of the stolen land would never return. They lost.

Sick burn.

Denmark huh? Before you make statements like this, why don't you check your own history and see where it was the Americans who rescued your ass from the Nazis in WWII as well. Let's just uproot you and bring you to some other part of the World and see how you like it. Or....by chance would you start defending your position based on your ancestor's history going back over 10,000 years?

Who did the chosen people of G-d steel it from?

So many of the world's troubles have been bred by lack of historical education and a ridiculous entitlement mentality.

No, it's a matter of private property and ownership law.

example... please provide example

A lot of people on GLP are very confused as to the "Palestinian" question. Here, read up -

There is no such thing as ‘Palestine’ nor ‘Palestinian people’

Before the state was declared in 1948 the word ‘Palestinian’ was used by the British as the name for Jews who lived in the British controlled land. But the term was hi-jacked, just as the terrorists hi-jacked planes and buses in order to blow them up, in order to further their jihad against the Jewish state.

There has never been a country called ‘Palestine’ and there is no such thing as a ‘Palestinian people’. The arabs who are occupying Jewish land came to Israel in order to prevent the establishment of the Jewish state. The British Mandate gave approximately 70% of the British land to the arabs who established the states Lebanon, Syria, and Jordan. The arabs who are occupying Israel belong in Lebanon, Syria, and Jordan and should be motivated, either monetarily or physically, to move away from the Jewish state.

[link to mytorah.wordpress.com]

[link to www.wnd.com]

[link to www.factsandlogic.org]

OP who owned your property before the English got there. I say it wasn't you or your family, SO LET THE AMERICAN INDIANS HAVE IT BACK. I SAY RISE MY BROTHERS AND SISTER AND GET OP'S PROPERTY AND TAKE BACK WHAT IS TRULY OURS.. How redundant op.. Your argument is stupid.

pure

And the homes they lived in were built on land stolen from Jews. They made bad decisions betting that the owners of the stolen land would never return. They lost.

Sick burn.

The real question is why are the zionists so obsessed with controlling this area?
wouldn't it have make much more sense that they seetled in some random state in america, whom came to their rescure in WW2, or simply go back to russia where they came from before seetlng in germany and all over europe. Why choice the middle east?

What good did they actually think would come out of that, there gotta be some agenda behind that decision, other than their own thousand year old self written propheties. All the misery that have come from this, to both their own and the muslims, let alone the trail this conflict have left all over the world. it doesn't make any sense.

And who are the people behind the zionist movement we always hear about on sites like this, how did they became so powerful that they pretty much control the whole western world, and how is it that noone actually know anything about them. Ask any random person at work if they know about the zionists and they will stare back with a blank look. I dunno what to think of it all.

I cite as proof this thread and the morons who reject the sum total of all of recorded human history.

Ug, Kimosabe.
Start your own thread on how poorly you've been treated by the white devils. And have a drink on me!

By that argument, should WE be in fear of the native americans someday acquiring this land back? You are scaring me!

Not the Native Americans.
The Anunnaki!

I don't drink and don't live on the reservation and don't take fed money, but through your argument will take your land when your willing to give someone elses... AGAIN, proof of history books you don't know "JACK"!

Well if the Annunaki try to take my land, I will fight for it.

Am I wrong for fighting?

Would you fight? lol

Not the Native Americans.
The Anunnaki!