BREAKING!! Obama to bypass congress to ban semiautomatic firearms!! | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 28614102 United States 11/28/2012 05:00 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1310640 United States 11/28/2012 05:00 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 23534110 United States 11/28/2012 05:01 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | YOU are a racists for pointing out color and accusing people of voting against it. Quoting: Little Willow No that is not racist. By your logic you wouldn't be able to accuse anyone of racism since you point out people of a certain colour and accuse other people of being against them simply because of colour. You make ZERO sense. Please learn to use the word logic in a sentence. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1516308 Netherlands 11/28/2012 05:02 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I'm high offended. Over 85% of Americans do not have ancestors that owned slaves. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 13310174 Well then, don't take it personally then. THEN DONT SINGLE OUT WHITE AMERICANS!!! Please I beg you, where did I single out white Americans? I singled out the people who go nuts about stories of Obama taking everybodies guns away. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 23534110 United States 11/28/2012 05:03 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1516308 Netherlands 11/28/2012 05:03 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 23534110 United States 11/28/2012 05:04 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1310640 WEll now, that's interesting. Did they shut off power and utilities? Did they shut down transportation grids and delivery of food and supplies? Did they blast pockets of 'resistance with arty and air assets and run over them with tracks and armor? Did the shut down netflix and youpron? I'd think if the gloves were really off, scorched earth and unrestrained violence against civilians would do the trick to a population more suited for dancing with the stars instead of shooting at them. Personally I think that when any pretext of civility towards so called rebels is removed by the mocha messiah, no quarter will be given until the wite debbil is all but exterminated You assume in this scenario that the members of the armed forces will be convinced to attack their fellow citizens. I don't share that assumption. In fact, I have just the opposite assumption. TPTB need people to fly those planes and drive those tanks. They need minions to kill fellow citizens. I don't believe that they will have the needed forces that are willing to turn on their own fellow citizens. I may be wrong, but I have faith that many if not most military members would join the fight against the government if it got to that point. Additionally, just so you know, terms like "mocha messiah" and "wite debbil" might be paint you as racist if someone doesn't know you very well. fear of hunger and holding families hostage can be effective motivators to loot and murder, throughout history. You dont need that many to do the deed, you simply need enough manpower to cut off access to power and supplies. After a week or two all resistance will effectively be over. Somehow someone helped kill off millions of their neighbors in russia, china, cambodia, vietnam, etc etc. Who were those people and what were they promised? They were not armed Exactly!! |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1310640 United States 11/28/2012 05:05 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1310640 WEll now, that's interesting. Did they shut off power and utilities? Did they shut down transportation grids and delivery of food and supplies? Did they blast pockets of 'resistance with arty and air assets and run over them with tracks and armor? Did the shut down netflix and youpron? I'd think if the gloves were really off, scorched earth and unrestrained violence against civilians would do the trick to a population more suited for dancing with the stars instead of shooting at them. Personally I think that when any pretext of civility towards so called rebels is removed by the mocha messiah, no quarter will be given until the wite debbil is all but exterminated You assume in this scenario that the members of the armed forces will be convinced to attack their fellow citizens. I don't share that assumption. In fact, I have just the opposite assumption. TPTB need people to fly those planes and drive those tanks. They need minions to kill fellow citizens. I don't believe that they will have the needed forces that are willing to turn on their own fellow citizens. I may be wrong, but I have faith that many if not most military members would join the fight against the government if it got to that point. Additionally, just so you know, terms like "mocha messiah" and "wite debbil" might be paint you as racist if someone doesn't know you very well. fear of hunger and holding families hostage can be effective motivators to loot and murder, throughout history. You dont need that many to do the deed, you simply need enough manpower to cut off access to power and supplies. After a week or two all resistance will effectively be over. Somehow someone helped kill off millions of their neighbors in russia, china, cambodia, vietnam, etc etc. Who were those people and what were they promised? They were not armed really? Youre suggesting that primarily agrarian societies didnt have weapons to hunt with or defend their homes? How quaint of you to believe that was the case, especially when there was no police force or expectation of rescue by mr gummint when problems and banditry arose. Certainly they had guns,(and no doubt bow'narrows and pointy sharp swords too) and most certainly someone came round and asked nicely for them, and they believed that it would end there. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 28614102 United States 11/28/2012 05:06 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | AND the one that has the least amount of ammo stocks available to it (with little ability to "resupply") Sure a "few" gun owners do have a lot of ammo, but with a typical ammo expenditure rate of 300 rounds per day per fighter when in battle being the planning numbers for armies HOW MANY DAYS COULD MOST PEOPLE'S AMMO SUPPLY KEEP THEM GOING? A 30 day supply is probably the MINIMUM that each person should have, but in reality how many people have 9000 rounds of ammo for their guns sitting in their closet? (and 22LR rounds do NOT count) The issue anymore isn't guns ... there are almost a couple of hundred million guns out there now ... the REAL issue is AMMO!! What good does someone buying another AR-15 do if on average they (across all the new buyers) only have 3 boxes (60 rounds) of ammo for it? Need to check your information haha US citizens have purchased over 9 billion rounds of ammo in the last 5 years lol |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 5374354 United States 11/28/2012 05:07 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | AND the one that has the least amount of ammo stocks available to it (with little ability to "resupply") Sure a "few" gun owners do have a lot of ammo, but with a typical ammo expenditure rate of 300 rounds per day per fighter when in battle being the planning numbers for armies HOW MANY DAYS COULD MOST PEOPLE'S AMMO SUPPLY KEEP THEM GOING? A 30 day supply is probably the MINIMUM that each person should have, but in reality how many people have 9000 rounds of ammo for their guns sitting in their closet? (and 22LR rounds do NOT count) The issue anymore isn't guns ... there are almost a couple of hundred million guns out there now ... the REAL issue is AMMO!! What good does someone buying another AR-15 do if on average they (across all the new buyers) only have 3 boxes (60 rounds) of ammo for it? I'm going to assume you don't actually hunt or know many people in the Midwest. A large majority supply and refill their own ammo be rifle or shotgun. Most don't exactly like the idea of driving to the Wally World to buy a 1000 round box of cheap Winchester high velocity nerf gun ammo the fails to eject 60% of the time. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 13159682 United States 11/28/2012 05:07 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | AND the one that has the least amount of ammo stocks available to it (with little ability to "resupply") Sure a "few" gun owners do have a lot of ammo, but with a typical ammo expenditure rate of 300 rounds per day per fighter when in battle being the planning numbers for armies HOW MANY DAYS COULD MOST PEOPLE'S AMMO SUPPLY KEEP THEM GOING? A 30 day supply is probably the MINIMUM that each person should have, but in reality how many people have 9000 rounds of ammo for their guns sitting in their closet? (and 22LR rounds do NOT count) The issue anymore isn't guns ... there are almost a couple of hundred million guns out there now ... the REAL issue is AMMO!! What good does someone buying another AR-15 do if on average they (across all the new buyers) only have 3 boxes (60 rounds) of ammo for it? Ummmm we plan on taking it off the dead |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1310640 United States 11/28/2012 05:07 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1055574 You assume in this scenario that the members of the armed forces will be convinced to attack their fellow citizens. I don't share that assumption. In fact, I have just the opposite assumption. TPTB need people to fly those planes and drive those tanks. They need minions to kill fellow citizens. I don't believe that they will have the needed forces that are willing to turn on their own fellow citizens. I may be wrong, but I have faith that many if not most military members would join the fight against the government if it got to that point. Additionally, just so you know, terms like "mocha messiah" and "wite debbil" might be paint you as racist if someone doesn't know you very well. fear of hunger and holding families hostage can be effective motivators to loot and murder, throughout history. You dont need that many to do the deed, you simply need enough manpower to cut off access to power and supplies. After a week or two all resistance will effectively be over. Somehow someone helped kill off millions of their neighbors in russia, china, cambodia, vietnam, etc etc. Who were those people and what were they promised? They were not armed Exactly!! so, you were there? It wasnt a matter of no arms, it was a matter of being OUTARMED by mr gummint, just like right here, right now. Thanks for the opportunity to make my point |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 28639446 United States 11/28/2012 05:08 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I'm high offended. Over 85% of Americans do not have ancestors that owned slaves. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 13310174 Well then, don't take it personally then. THEN DONT SINGLE OUT WHITE AMERICANS!!! Please I beg you, where did I single out white Americans? I singled out the people who go nuts about stories of Obama taking everybodies guns away. Well, you ARE singling out Americans that aren't black, since you made it a race issue. However, since race wars in America are generally white vs black, one would have to assume that you are, indeed, singling out whites. Therefore, you are making racist remarks, which is ironic because it looks like you are condemning others of being racist. Nothing more to say. You are a troll. One more time, you don't have to incorporate the race card to "single out the people who go nuts about stories of Obama taking everybodies guns away." Get it? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 28008747 United States 11/28/2012 05:08 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | YOU are a racists for pointing out color and accusing people of voting against it. Quoting: Little Willow No that is not racist. By your logic you wouldn't be able to accuse anyone of racism since you point out people of a certain colour and accuse other people of being against them simply because of colour. THAT IS RACIST!!! THINK BEFORE YOU SPEAK!!! ITS A STEREOTYPE WITH RACE ATTACHED!!! It's not illegal to be racist. In fact it's not even wrong. At least, if mentioning any stereotype with race attached is racist, because that's certainly not wrong. It's necessary for clear communication and clear thinking. You can call it whatever you want, enjoy yourself. :) |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 13310174 United States 11/28/2012 05:08 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I'm high offended. Over 85% of Americans do not have ancestors that owned slaves. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 13310174 Well then, don't take it personally then. THEN DONT SINGLE OUT WHITE AMERICANS!!! Please I beg you, where did I single out white Americans? I singled out the people who go nuts about stories of Obama taking everybodies guns away. And i quote "he will surely ban guns so the blacks can finally take revenge on us for what we did to them for so many years" That IS singling out white Americans. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 23534110 United States 11/28/2012 05:09 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1055574 You assume in this scenario that the members of the armed forces will be convinced to attack their fellow citizens. I don't share that assumption. In fact, I have just the opposite assumption. TPTB need people to fly those planes and drive those tanks. They need minions to kill fellow citizens. I don't believe that they will have the needed forces that are willing to turn on their own fellow citizens. I may be wrong, but I have faith that many if not most military members would join the fight against the government if it got to that point. Additionally, just so you know, terms like "mocha messiah" and "wite debbil" might be paint you as racist if someone doesn't know you very well. fear of hunger and holding families hostage can be effective motivators to loot and murder, throughout history. You dont need that many to do the deed, you simply need enough manpower to cut off access to power and supplies. After a week or two all resistance will effectively be over. Somehow someone helped kill off millions of their neighbors in russia, china, cambodia, vietnam, etc etc. Who were those people and what were they promised? They were not armed really? Youre suggesting that primarily agrarian societies didnt have weapons to hunt with or defend their homes? How quaint of you to believe that was the case, especially when there was no police force or expectation of rescue by mr gummint when problems and banditry arose. Certainly they had guns,(and no doubt bow'narrows and pointy sharp swords too) and most certainly someone came round and asked nicely for them, and they believed that it would end there. How "quaint" of you to believe communists countries were armed in the same way America is and will be in order to protect us against becoming a communist country. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1516308 Netherlands 11/28/2012 05:10 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 28614102 United States 11/28/2012 05:10 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1055574 You assume in this scenario that the members of the armed forces will be convinced to attack their fellow citizens. I don't share that assumption. In fact, I have just the opposite assumption. TPTB need people to fly those planes and drive those tanks. They need minions to kill fellow citizens. I don't believe that they will have the needed forces that are willing to turn on their own fellow citizens. I may be wrong, but I have faith that many if not most military members would join the fight against the government if it got to that point. Additionally, just so you know, terms like "mocha messiah" and "wite debbil" might be paint you as racist if someone doesn't know you very well. fear of hunger and holding families hostage can be effective motivators to loot and murder, throughout history. You dont need that many to do the deed, you simply need enough manpower to cut off access to power and supplies. After a week or two all resistance will effectively be over. Somehow someone helped kill off millions of their neighbors in russia, china, cambodia, vietnam, etc etc. Who were those people and what were they promised? They were not armed really? Youre suggesting that primarily agrarian societies didnt have weapons to hunt with or defend their homes? How quaint of you to believe that was the case, especially when there was no police force or expectation of rescue by mr gummint when problems and banditry arose. Certainly they had guns,(and no doubt bow'narrows and pointy sharp swords too) and most certainly someone came round and asked nicely for them, and they believed that it would end there. Lol your comparing an apple to a raisin, the US is 100% unique , never in history ha a country been so well armed and allowed access to unlimited resources that create major force multipliers haha |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1310640 United States 11/28/2012 05:11 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | AND the one that has the least amount of ammo stocks available to it (with little ability to "resupply") Sure a "few" gun owners do have a lot of ammo, but with a typical ammo expenditure rate of 300 rounds per day per fighter when in battle being the planning numbers for armies HOW MANY DAYS COULD MOST PEOPLE'S AMMO SUPPLY KEEP THEM GOING? A 30 day supply is probably the MINIMUM that each person should have, but in reality how many people have 9000 rounds of ammo for their guns sitting in their closet? (and 22LR rounds do NOT count) The issue anymore isn't guns ... there are almost a couple of hundred million guns out there now ... the REAL issue is AMMO!! What good does someone buying another AR-15 do if on average they (across all the new buyers) only have 3 boxes (60 rounds) of ammo for it? Ummmm we plan on taking it off the dead Personally, I dont recommend having your family members hold your ammo for you. On the other hand, they'll be close enough so you dont have to break cover and join them yet... |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 28639446 United States 11/28/2012 05:12 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | And i quote "he will surely ban guns so the blacks can finally take revenge on us for what we did to them for so many years" That IS singling out white Americans. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 13310174 So only white Americans have done bad things to blacks? Now you are being racist. Who were you referring to? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 8668963 United States 11/28/2012 05:12 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | By the comments everyone has made to you so far, we all pretty much agree you are just causing trouble here. Quoting: Jeepster Really? Shit, I thought everybody here was agreeing with me. Damn, now I have to find a different circle-jerk group cause I can't stand people disagreeing with me. Please go find a dyke to plug! |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1516308 Netherlands 11/28/2012 05:13 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | And i quote "he will surely ban guns so the blacks can finally take revenge on us for what we did to them for so many years" That IS singling out white Americans. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 13310174 So only white Americans have done bad things to blacks? Now you are being racist. Who were you referring to? Anonymous Coward 13310174 |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 9231012 United States 11/28/2012 05:13 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | It is pretty much a moot move to try to remove guns from American citizens because gun registration has not always been in place and there are untold amounts of firearms in civilian hands that have never been registered because many are family heirlooms or purchased before registration was required. If they ban ammunition that will only create an under ground market like they did when they made Marijuana illegal between people that know how to reload ammunition. If there is one thing the FEDS despise is any under ground collusions. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 28614102 United States 11/28/2012 05:13 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1310640 fear of hunger and holding families hostage can be effective motivators to loot and murder, throughout history. You dont need that many to do the deed, you simply need enough manpower to cut off access to power and supplies. After a week or two all resistance will effectively be over. Somehow someone helped kill off millions of their neighbors in russia, china, cambodia, vietnam, etc etc. Who were those people and what were they promised? They were not armed Exactly!! so, you were there? It wasnt a matter of no arms, it was a matter of being OUTARMED by mr gummint, just like right here, right now. Thanks for the opportunity to make my point 1,200,000 against 55,000,000 plus uhm that is not out armed jack wagon lol what a tool! LMFAO! |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 28659966 Australia 11/28/2012 05:13 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1516308 Netherlands 11/28/2012 05:14 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1310640 United States 11/28/2012 05:15 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1310640 fear of hunger and holding families hostage can be effective motivators to loot and murder, throughout history. You dont need that many to do the deed, you simply need enough manpower to cut off access to power and supplies. After a week or two all resistance will effectively be over. Somehow someone helped kill off millions of their neighbors in russia, china, cambodia, vietnam, etc etc. Who were those people and what were they promised? They were not armed really? Youre suggesting that primarily agrarian societies didnt have weapons to hunt with or defend their homes? How quaint of you to believe that was the case, especially when there was no police force or expectation of rescue by mr gummint when problems and banditry arose. Certainly they had guns,(and no doubt bow'narrows and pointy sharp swords too) and most certainly someone came round and asked nicely for them, and they believed that it would end there. How "quaint" of you to believe communists countries were armed in the same way America is and will be in order to protect us against becoming a communist country. ^sigh* In times past the odds were far better for the public than presently. in the past, a soldier had to be face to face with his adversary, not so much nowadays. You can be dispatched with ease and not even see it coming or know you were in trouble. And that's the real problem... |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 28614102 United States 11/28/2012 05:17 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | really? Youre suggesting that primarily agrarian societies didnt have weapons to hunt with or defend their homes? How quaint of you to believe that was the case, especially when there was no police force or expectation of rescue by mr gummint when problems and banditry arose. Certainly they had guns,(and no doubt bow'narrows and pointy sharp swords too) and most certainly someone came round and asked nicely for them, and they believed that it would end there. How "quaint" of you to believe communists countries were armed in the same way America is and will be in order to protect us against becoming a communist country. ^sigh* In times past the odds were far better for the public than presently. in the past, a soldier had to be face to face with his adversary, not so much nowadays. You can be dispatched with ease and not even see it coming or know you were in trouble. And that's the real problem... Once again you have no clue how useless the US military will be on its on soil. I commanded troops and you sir have no clue. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 28614102 United States 11/28/2012 05:18 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 28008747 United States 11/28/2012 05:19 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 28614102 1,200,000 against 55,000,000 plus uhm that is not out armed jack wagon lol what a tool! LMFAO! That's the main reason this is a good country to live in. Change that, and I'll probably think of moving out. Although already the government has asymmetrical warfare tools such as chemtrails, weather warfare (e.g. Sandy), drones and probably some new ones that nobody's expecting. |