Duat do what

I wonder if it's a question of what Lucifer is or of what Lucifer does

I wonder if it's a question of what Lucifer is or of what Lucifer does

I wonder if it's a question of what Lucifer is or of what Lucifer does

Now link that with the the immense fresh water reserve...solid state battery production...heightened solar efficiency and distillation process and cross reference the beginning of the asymptotic thread.


Cheers

Is it too early to start drinking? I have one of those little mini bottles of rum someone left here.

Go well in coffee? Only one way to find out.

[link to i.imgur.com (secure)]

Reminds:
[link to imgur.com (secure)]

Isaiah 14:12
"How you are fallen from heaven, O shining star, son of the morning! You have been thrown down to the earth, you who destroyed the nations of the world.

Anything goes when in coffee, lol

No one else sees all the delicious ironies in this post?

It was better than whiskey. But still not very good. It's sitting cold next to me now.

that's a forceful language picture of the distribution of a group of forces of original meaning becoming scattered away from their original location and becoming known a very many different things of varying meaning from region to region of their scattered meaning
prompting the notion that at anytime something of known meaning becomes something of unknown meaning in the experience of people not expecting the sudden experience they experience

environment alteration of Gaia increases the probability of meaning changes its meaning of things of importance to people

Did some more research.

So just how are people rated? Individuals on Sesame Credit are measured by a score ranging between 350 and 950 points. Alibaba does not divulge the "complex algorithm" it uses to calculate the number but they do reveal the five factors taken into account. The first is credit history. For example, does the citizen pay their electricity or phone bill on time? Next is fulfilment capacity, which it defines in its guidelines as "a user's ability to fulfil his/her contract obligations". The third factor is personal characteristics, verifying personal information such as someone's mobile phone number and address. But the fourth category, behaviour and preference, is where it gets interesting.

Under this system, something as innocuous as a person's shopping habits become a measure of character. Alibaba admits it judges people by the types of products they buy. "Someone who plays video games for ten hours a day, for example, would be considered an idle person," says Li Yingyun, Sesame's Technology Director. "Someone who frequently buys diapers would be considered as probably a parent, who on balance is more likely to have a sense of responsibility." So the system not only investigates behaviour - it shapes it. It "nudges" citizens away from purchases and behaviours the government does not like.

Friends matter, too. The fifth category is interpersonal relationships. What does their choice of online friends and their interactions say about the person being assessed? Sharing what Sesame Credit refers to as "positive energy" online, nice messages about the government or how well the country's economy is doing, will make your score go up.

Alibaba is adamant that, currently, anything negative posted on social media does not affect scores (we don't know if this is true or not because the algorithm is secret). But you can see how this might play out when the government's own citizen score system officially launches in 2020. Even though there is no suggestion yet that any of the eight private companies involved in the ongoing pilot scheme will be ultimately responsible for running the government's own system, it's hard to believe that the government will not want to extract the maximum amount of data for its SCS, from the pilots. If that happens, and continues as the new normal under the government's own SCS it will result in private platforms acting essentially as spy agencies for the government. They may have no choice.

Posting dissenting political opinions or links mentioning Tiananmen Square has never been wise in China, but now it could directly hurt a citizen's rating. But here's the real kicker: a person's own score will also be affected by what their online friends say and do, beyond their own contact with them. If someone they are connected to online posts a negative comment, their own score will also be dragged down.
[link to www.wired.co.uk]

Feedback on this, of course online matches what people do naturally offline

[link to www.livescience.com (secure)]

But a study we conducted of one Chinese region provided an opportunity to test the most common hypothesis – that witchcraft accusations act as punishment for those who do not cooperate with local norms. According to this theory, witch tags mark supposedly untrustworthy individuals and encourage others to conform out of fear of being labelled. However, some empirical studies have shown that witch labelling instead undermines trust and social cohesion in a society.

The tag was one of the strongest predictors of assortment on social networks. Those from tagged households rarely had children or partnerships with those from untagged households, nor did they exchange gifts or work on each others' farms very often. However, tagged households were helping each other and reproducing with each other, which mitigated the costs of exclusion from mainstream social networks.

You found out. Rum is more tropical drink, not really warming type of drink.

It was pretty gross.

I wonder if it's a question of what Lucifer is or of what Lucifer does

Recalls of the social castes in India. The 'Untouchables'.

Truly barbaric. But people find a way.

No one else sees all the delicious ironies in this post?

Next time....egg nog and or heavy cream.

Why stuck on the poopularity thing?

Yes...apparently huffing their own excrement in sunbaked plastic bags for the ammonia jolt.

Nothing better than topping off a day picking through shit than inhaling it deeply for fleeting relief.

[link to en.m.wikipedia.org (secure)]

scroll to 'pharmacology'.


.... .... .... (eep!)


~


Good morning everyone.

Going to the next town over in a couple hours with my family to meet up with a counselor. I have been presenting as female lately and while my family seemed ok with me coming out as it were, it seems perhaps not as completely so as I had thought and hoped.

But whatever, I'm going to put up with it I guess, try and set out my point of reasoning the best I can. .... probably too chicken to go in my best dress, but, I think I can get to that point eventually.

Been doing much better with pills lately but still not necessarily getting a ton of sleep, is a priority of mine to not discuss potentially oblique Spirit-based reasons for things with authoritative (.... read: scripting) Figures for fear of receiving schizophrenia diagnosis.... and that doesn't really leave much for me to discuss, save for what amounts to identity issues I have felt since childhood.


.... slugged back a little o' that Canadian pre-krok last night, tasted kind of funny and is leaving me a tad fine-tined so I figure may have failed in the caffeine straining process?

sounds a bit Jesus to me

That sounds good.

Not sure what you mean. The Chinese social credit thing?

Because I find it terrifying and to think something like that could come to USA due to China owning our debt..

I realized that ending religion would just cause something like that to happen. Feels like traps everywhere.

Instant accessibility and oversight will alter the context of the game.

Actions will be easily linked and crossreferenced without the need for further invasion of privacy or conjecture.

It reconciles the inward and outward face while tracking the trajectory of will.

Organic data points over matriculated propaganda.

I like what you say about that
nice description and thanks for providing it