Notes from an "alternate universe". Introduction to a new way of thinking.

Thank you. Something I realized as I read this is I also have a reverse thing going on too. There are things I don't want to change.

I have several relatives, all in their late 80's and early 90's. I enjoy them very much. I have often thought that something I am doing is keeping them here. Because really, they probably should have left by now, or at least some of them. Their trials are difficult, yet somehow, each of them makes it through to a brighter day, at least in some way.

They inspire me as I watch them and they have a tenderness that brings tears to my eyes. I have even felt guilty for keeping them here even though I can't say I know how I am doing so, if in fact that is the case. Since it's my perspective, I guess it is.

I know Chaol says this:

"If some of your perceptions are good while others are bad, then it is difficult to see your reality as a single perspective."

This is the challenge for me.

1) When you got off the escalator at the mall and saw the popcorn, was the popcorn to your right?

2) What areas would you say your expertise is in? I ask this so I know what questions to ask you. I have many, heh!

Amen.

I saw a post in GLP, where someone described his/her internal process when this happens. S/he said the process eventually became automatic in the subconscious, because of the repetitiveness of the exercise.

The best to you and thanks for the reminder.

our reality is based on our belief systems. LITERALLY

Since everything is within our perspective the only way to expand it is to see that which we don't see.

I believe the easiest way to do this is question that which we resist.

We resist something because we don't understand it from our perspective.

For example, Someone getting angry for being cut off in traffic.

Anger is their default... their reality.

However if instead they practiced analyzing that which they resist they might think:

1. perhaps someone is on the floor dying and he is in a great hurry
2. Maybe he didn't see me

Getting angry is basically assuming you know the situation from your current perspective. It is egotistical and an impossibility and thus not inclusive with a higher perspective.

When we make assumption like that we collapse possibility waves.

By getting angry that, the person is possibility assuming several things like:

A that the person cut him on on purpose
B that it negatively affects him
C that the driver doesn't have good reason

If he acted in joy and understood that the universe will always deliver us the best possible thing for us from the highest possible perspective he might realize something like:

1. that by being 1 minute later he walks past a new girl in his office, and see her drop a book which happens to be his favorite and they get talking. go out for coffee. Fall in love and marry.

2. That he narrowly avoided an accident by that car putting him 1 minute behind where he normally would be

3. That he doesn't have time to stop at his regular coffee shop so stops at mcdonalds and wins 1 million dollars in the monopoly game.


This is true for every interaction you have!!!

You are creating your mind set based on your current conscious and unconscious beliefs.

I have lately been taking boring tasks and thinking and practice "unlogic". "what would I have to believe this task is fun." When you start thinking like this you can change your beliefs about anything you dislike.

Hitler was a complete dick, BUT he created such a dark mindset that the world has pretty much put an end to obvious large scale war conflict, and has gave a contrast of such deep evil that it allows the rest of humanity to reach an even greater level of happiness now. He allowed us to see that which we are not, greatly expanding our perspectives and allowing a higher good. (law of relationships)

So this good or evil thing is really subjective based on how we our willing to structure our perspective.

We have the power to create the reality we want, we just have to define it. As you begin to "unlogic" things you, like me, will begin to see everything brighter. You will begin to have a sense of unlimited potential, and you will draw into your reality more of the kind of things that you truly want to see.

Representation: Name published in Forbes 400 List

symbol: american silver eagle
wrapped in swim suit padding
tapped together with orange duct tape
embelished with orange pipe cleaner
embelishment taped on with blue insulation tape
uncovered padding scented with eucalyptus essential oil.

Space: coffee table

interaction: people, objects, and animals interfacing with it.

Logic:
When awake on time I will squeeze it.
When break record working out will raise and drop onto table.
when I meet calorie goal for the day will smell.
Every time I Make 10 thousand USD will do dance with symbol in my hand.

This is all very inspiring, Dodec! I am going to take all of it to heart. Thank you for this analysis.

A challenge for me too!

When I think of good vs. bad, I see the yin/yang symbol, where half of a circle is white (with a spot of black in it), and the other half is black (with a spot of white in it). Instead of the stark borders of the symbol, I see instead a shading effect of white dissipating into black, and black merging into white.

It seems to be a very instructive symbol of how both black and white combine to form one perspective.

The popcorn was in front of me because I actually did a 360 to stop and laugh.

My specialty is in the Genius model and ecsys language.

Just want to say thank you chaol for providing the genius. It is true. It has worked for me finally today, I started around 1-2 weeks ago.

The steps to making a Genius map follow the basic principles of Ecsys Prime.

1-Create symbol: Represent your desired thought, object, or experience physically.
(My symbol was a hand image drawn of a va jay jay, that I did)
2-Find possibility: Create or use space for your symbol or the interactions.
(I drew the va jay jay on a small peice of lined white hand notebook paper and placed it inside my coat jacket pocket)
3-Interact: Allow the symbol or representation to interact with the various elements of your reaity
Placed the folded symbol into my inside coat jacket
5-Structure: For added bonus, develop structure around the interactions.

(open and folded it multiple times in a certain way, and reopened it the same way every 2-3 days)

I also occasionally visualized my symbol and thoughts. Thank you once again, and thank you for the supporters of ec. Very neat stuff.
And thank you once more for being a great person.

Nice. Always good to look into what we resist, for sure.

Chaol also says to expand our perspective by doing things differently than we usually do (that's why I started posting about my personal life here.......I have never done that before.) and you are doing it with the boring tasks.

HE also says to feel things we have never felt before...so I'm sure working on that by doing things I've never done before.


Your good/evil sentence is very nice. I've flat-lined a lot of my good/evil perceptions, but I still have some pretty strong preferences. If I didn't, how would I know what I desire so my Genius can be employed? j/k

What can I say....I'm a work in progress. heh!

Last Edited by ERE3 on 12/04/2012 12:06 PM

TY, once again!!!!!

Did you turn left or right when you did the 360?


How do you connect a Genius to a nexus point?

And how do you ascertain a nexus point? If we create our perspective, don't we also create the nexus point?

Gespenst, here's the NASA announcement we've been waiting on...magnetic highway at the end of the Solar System....


[link to www.rawstory.com]

I turned left.

The nexus point is a built in portion of the genius. All possibility (anything used for space, energy or capacity) is a nexus point. The size of the nexus point can vary. New York City on 9/11 = huge nexus. Your bathroom at 2:36 am yesterday = small nexus point.

Even though we have learned that space is not physical, this article about reaching the very edges of our solar system still excites my neurons. Look at what we have here with the Voyagers I and II: symbols, logic, interaction and possibilty. All of the gods are involved.

But isn't everything physical?

A paradox!

If anything can be perceived, then it is physical.

However, no thing is physical. There is no thing there.

From page 1 of this thread:

Thread: Neuronics: The future of humanity (Humanity without physicality)

Thread: Neuronics: The future of humanity (Humanity without physicality) (Page 2)

So is Chaol building in the nexus for his Nov 17 trip every year?

You turned left? I could swear that for an instant, I was there and saw the popcorn, but I saw it to my right.

I still don't understand why the website says:

"Your physical body is mostly non-human.

Emotions like happiness and loneliness, diseases like cancer and schizophrenia, and abilities like cognition and communication are actually infections we get from animals, food, the environment, outer space, and other people."


Sounds to me like there is physicality (but we are evolving away from it) and also there is something outside of a single perspective. Otherwise, why would one create an infection from outer space?

Could Chaol possibly believe in a Higher Power but not call it that or not recognize it? Has anyone ever asked Chaol who created him? (I have a question waiting on him in another post earlier in this thread. I believe he does believe in some kind of outer influence....after all, he says it just happened that he met his girlfriend....what made it "just happen?:)

Fun questions, IMHO, Unit3.

Something I have been pondering for the past couple days:

We perceive so as to feel as if we exist, right? We form relationships in order to feel that we are alive.

But, there is the "Nothing" that is beyond perception and to which existence is irrelevant. We are told that the Nothing is everything.

Well, then, who invented perception? The Nothing? But, It does not need to perceive in order to exist, right?

I am thinking that there is some intermediate force that springs from "the Nothing" and which then creates, I suppose, the non-physical.

You are my mirror image unit.

That is what Chaol says...we won't feel we exist unless we have perceptions. And, according to Chaol, he forgets, just like we do, that his perceptions aren't real.

I did find myself once in what I felt was Chaol....and it was a sort of nothingness but with a feeling of awareness. (I hope that makes sense.)

I have tried many times to feel Nothing...but there is always something...texture, peace, awareness...something to observe.

It's kind of like, how does the uncreated have creation?

Wow! That sent chills up.

It makes perfect sense to me. I even wrote about the same sensation a ways back in this thread. I call it "The Big Quiet".


We really cannot even discuss a "Nothing", because as soon as we think of it, it becomes "something".


!!!
How, indeed?

Okay, okay. Look. There is something that is, like, on the tip of my tongue.

Consciousness is the result of at least two things interacting, right? Consciousness is the geometry formed when two things relate.

You are conscious, right? I am, too, I guess. I mean, here I am! Here you are!

This means that at least two things are interacting, forming a consciousness which we are calling "me".

When Chaol is in our world, he is conscious (or appears to be! lol). That means that something is interacting with something else in order to form a geometry that results in a consciousness that we are calling "Chaol".

So, what is Chaol when he is NOT intersecting this world? What are WE when we are NOT intersecting this world?

Could it be that we are also what Chaol is? Could THAT be the "other you" that is waiting for us?

Chaol has asked very plainly, "If I am you, then what am I?"

Well...
Well...
Aaargh.