DUTCHSINSE — Moon verified to be out of place — ‘Lunar Anomaly’ — Planet X / Tyche / Nemesis would have to be 30AU

What is so frustrating about Nasty is that they will never blow your socks off with any kind of great discovery. Even when they send a probe to Mars, it is usually aimed at a pile of rocks, when there are so many great sites with exciting artifacts, to be seen. It has even been pointed out even the atmospheric color of Mars is not what it should be. And....what is really so hilarious is the fact while Mars is so overwhelmed with clouds, created by water vapor, NASA was trying to convince us it was an extremely dry planet void of water. This was an obvious deception to discourage us into believing life could exist there. Another deliberate deception was to make fuzzy pictures, when they had the camera technology to read a license plate 20 thousand miles away. To think we, as taxpayers, are paying these birds our hard earned money, while they are doing everything in their power to insult our intelligence.

Now....you ask me why I am so angry? It is because I feel betrayed, and lied to by an arrogant bunch of self serving jerks, who have no concern for anyone outside their own secret elite group. Throwing the public a few crumbs, while they are eating the cake, is what they do.

[link to www.filmbaby.com]

You made the following statements:

NASA and the Air Force work together all the time!

To me, that comprimises all their data. A Space agency shouldn't require a military approval to release information. They are different companies for a REASON.

NASA and the Air Force don't work together "all the time".

There is no reason to believe that NASA and the Air Force working together "compromises all their data".

No clue what you are talking about but the composition of the atmosphere of Mars is

Atmospheric composition (by volume):
Major:
Carbon Dioxide (CO2) - 95.32% ;
Nitrogen (N2) - 2.7%
Argon (Ar) - 1.6%;
Oxygen (O2) - 0.13%;
Carbon Monoxide (CO) - 0.08%

Minor (ppm):
Water (H2O) - 210;
Nitrogen Oxide (NO) - 100;
Neon (Ne) - 2.5;
Hydrogen-Deuterium-Oxygen (HDO) - 0.85;
Krypton (Kr) - 0.3;
Xenon (Xe) - 0.08

[link to nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov]

There is water in the atmosphere but Mars is very dry, as seen by the composition. Compare that to Earth where 1% of the atmosphere is water vapor.

Most of the clouds are frozen carbon dioxide with some clouds made of water ice.

[link to www.space.com]
[link to mars.jpl.nasa.gov]

All the information is out there. You have to learn how to search for it. Hint, you should not rely on GLP as your primary source of information.

Last Edited by F=ma on 11/20/2011 08:32 PM

Pin? I suggest a nail!

[link to www.ufo-blogger.com]


same people, earthquakes caused by Elenin!

This is more likely the composition of "swamp gas". I wouldn't trust NASA to tell me the truth, if my life depended on it. These clowns are the same ones that scoffed, and ridiculed anyone, and everyone who claimed to see a flying saucer, until they couldn't deny it any longer.

If they want something covered up, mockery, and ridicule is what they do. Does this sound familiar?

[link to www.vgl.org]

Yet you unquestionably trust a crazy old lady from Wisconsin.


Don't lie.


People who see faces in geological features, clouds, toast, coffee grinds, etc. and think they are real faces deserve noting but ridicule.
If they keep whining about it they deserve mockery as well.

So....do you really think we went to the Moon in 1969? Buzz Aldrin couldn't hide the truth, as per his testimony.

[link to www.youtube.com]

I saw the moon almost upside down, about a month ago. It look tilted like 90 degrees.

It was the most unnatural looking thing

(Yes, I was sober and standing)

Why not? The erratic weather changes, and all the chaos we are now experiencing was forewarned by her, and the Zetas almost 2 decades ago. All the fearful, weak minded skeptics, like yourself, haven't been able to shut her down, as of yet.

"Zetas right again" still applies, until proven otherwise.

That's what the evidence shows.


We already know you are moran.
No need to keep rubbing it in by once again NOT CHECKING your "information".
[link to www.npr.org]


Because she always wrong.


B.S.
More bad weather was predicted by climate scientists way before that.
And when has the world ever not been chaotic?


We wouldn't want that.
She's the entertainment.


Proven every single instance.
Tell us again Zetaism isn't a religion.

Drive by karma attack!!!!!

You just got caught up in a drive-by Karma attack by Doommincus Maximus


Halcyon Dayz, FCD :karma up:
Ohwell :karma up:
yourmamaknOws :karma up:
Pink Cat with a Telephone Hat :karma up:
AstrOmut :karma up:
Pangn :karma up:
SnakeAirlines :karma up:
UNtypical USer :karma up:
F=ma :karma up:
DontListenToMe :karma up:



Peace and Love GLPE

I agree with you, hit and miss. that video is a def miss tho.

NASA, Air Force, Area 51, etc... There is one common thread: the government. Are we reduced to debunking government with government? That fails logic. Secrets are generally lies generated to mislead. Classified just means VERY expensive.

You do not trust because you are ignorant. That is not my or NASAs fault. That is you own undoing. Do not try to impose your worldview created from ignorance and paranoia on me.

Look up field rotation

Global warming, which predicted weather with more extremes, was discussed 40 years ago.

[link to www.jstor.org]
[link to adsabs.harvard.edu]
[link to adsabs.harvard.edu]

You are nothing but a "stubborn hothead", who is unable to see the light of day. If it was, for the fact, that I, only, did not have faith in NASA's fabrications, you could possibly have a point, however, we know this is definitely not true. We were set up, for this make believe 1969 Apollo mission, just like the phony 9/11 attack on the WTC. For one, we did not have the technology, nor the computers, to attempt such a task, in those days. NASA is a big fraud, and has been exposed to lying more than a few times. Your insults, and childish accusations could never convince me otherwise, unless you had the proof to back it up.

By the way....why do you insist "moron" is spelled "moran"? Everyone knows you are wrong, just like everything else your mind will not allow you to see.

So you are unable to discuss so you respond with a rant about insults. At no time have I called you moron or moran and have no idea why you fabricate such thing. Besides, moran is a spelling used on the internet and comes from a misspelling years ago.

[link to www.urbandictionary.com]

As far as Mars composition, NASA is only reporting results found by others. Most research is done at the university level. Some under grants from NASA but many from grants from NSF, state and local government, and public and private foundations. It is a total frabrication to say NASA does and controls all research in some field. They do not and cannot.

The Apollo computer was not sophisticated but then it really didn't have that much to do comparatively. It did not fly the craft. It provided guidance and iluminated indicators. If was reprogrammed for different parts of the mission.

[link to downloadsquad.switched.com]

If you have never programmed in assembly language, I have, you do not understand the power of a small, well designed program. All you are comparing this to is the bloated operating systems of Windows and Apple. Most of the computer power goes to making the screens look pretty and understandable to people untrained in computer system design and implementation.

Last Edited by F=ma on 11/21/2011 10:35 AM

Projection.
You're the one who believes in a Magical Mystery Planet™ contrary to evidence and reason.


Who is this "we" you speak off?
And you obviously know nuthin'.


Conspiracist myth not supported by any evidence.


Conspiracist myth not supported by any evidence.


Argument from ignorance.
Nobody who knows the technology agrees with that.


Conspiracist myth not supported by any evidence.


So you keep claiming but never proof.


You are way beyond convincing.
You can't reason a person out of a position they didn't reason themselves into.

You have have no knowledge, just believes.
Very irrational, counter-factual believes.


Evidence has been presented to you for years.
Apparently you have a cognitive block against reality.


Tell us again, why shouldn't I call you a moran?
You are so sure of yourself, yet always wrong.

What the moon is made of DOESN'T MATTER.

That it is peopled with human beings just like us DOES MATTER.

That the NRO/NSA/NASA get these two sets of data points confused --

says volumes about lacking quality leadership.

They're mad as hatters, stupefied as bags of hammers as only compartmentalised workers can be.

NASA doesn't even know, what they don't know.

They don't even LOOK at their own photos.

Duh!


EEWC

Would you like to see some lakes on Mars? It would appear there is plenty of water, as well as structural housing. Now....wouldn’t this be more interesting, than a pile of rocks, to view from a probe, or lander?

[link to video.search.yahoo.com]

[link to video.search.yahoo.com]

Confirmation bias. You see what you want to see. Dust and craters is not liquid water. Get a grip.

Confirmation bias? Yes, definitely confirmation....Or would you prefer non-confirmation?

Sailed over your head did it.

Confirmation bias (also called confirmatory bias or myside bias) is a tendency for people to favor information that confirms their preconceptions or hypotheses regardless of whether the information is true. As a result, people gather evidence and recall information from memory selectively, and interpret it in a biased way. The biases appear in particular for emotionally significant issues and for established beliefs.

No. You just think I am unfair in my dislike for NASA. I have given them every opportunity to come clean about the knowledge they have obtained, from the use of our money. We are obviously not getting the benefit from anything they label "Top Secret", which includes Alien contact, and "artifacts" found on planets in our Solar System. To guard their secrets, they intentionally lie about everything that is affiliated with what they are trying to protect. If you think that is being biased, then your mind is not open to the obvious fact they are not working for the benefit of the average citizen.

I am not going to bring up the issue of Planet X, and their future plans regarding its disclosure. I will state, however, that whatever they tell us should be taken with a grain of salt, and always be suspiciously objective, keeping in mind there is always a hidden motive behind everything they say.

And there is the cognitive bias.
NASA refuses to validate your delusions, therefor they must be lying.


You believe in an invisible fairy planet.
Why should anyone take your unevidenced fantasies into consideration?
It's not just NASA who says you are wrong, pretty much everyone sane does.

The loony lady from Wisconsin has been preaching her insanity on the internet since, when, 1995?
She has entertained millions, but convinced only a few dozen.
A few dozen who no doubt would have joined some other crazy cult if Nancy hadn't been around.

It has nothing to do with your dislike. It has everything to do with your illogic.

Being the English language can be twisted around to misrepresent exactly what I am trying to say, it is not my fault you are unable to catch my drift. Who cares what YOU think. I am not obligated to convince you of my feelings toward anything, or anyone. As far as your opinion, you are on your own....I could care less. besides, I have never expected to get a perfect score of approval....especially from "shills".

If, as you say, "you could care less", that means you do care some at this time. Perhaps you meant "you could not care less".