Asteroid 2012 DA14 is getting bigger and bigger. WTF? | |
Dr. Astro Senior Forum Moderator User ID: 4211721 United States 02/12/2013 02:48 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | So then if the size is bigger and the original size they said would effect a 750 mile area imagine what a bigger size would effect?? Of course though astromut says it wont hit so I guess we believe him, however if they were wrong at NASA on size then how do we know they were not wrong on where its going?? Of course if they were wrong they wouldn't tell us would they?? Quoting: pmb1 No they won't... They don't know anything more than you and me and the astroDR. They just hope that it won't hit. Yes, actually people like me and those at NASA do know more than you. So why didn't you genious didn't estimate the actual size before? The size is irrelevant, but you can see the absolute magnitude figure (H) in the orbital elements that I calculated for it. Currently the absolute magnitude calculated is about 24.1 according to the minor planet center, about the same from NASA. Diameter = 1329/Sqrt(albedo) * 10^(-.2*H) All diameter estimates are based on an assumption of the asteroid's albedo. This generally ranges from about .05 to .25. If we go with an average of about .15, then the asteroid's diameter is about 51 meters. If we assume it's a very dark asteroid, about as dark as fresh asphalt with an albedo of 0.05, then the asteroid is potentially about 89 meters wide. We'll have a much firmer determination of the size from radar observations that will start on the 16th. Generally you can expect it to be less than 100 meters wide, nominally about 51 meters. Spaceweather may be weighing the various photometric measurements in some way that yields a brighter absolute magnitude however. |
Anonymous Coward 02/12/2013 02:48 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I had another one of my infamous "There's a 1000ft. tsunami coming!" dreams AGAINNN lastnight. This time I was in a boat (why the fuck) and the classic flipping over of the boat started happening. Breaking my body on the ceiling, on the floor, water pouring in. Anybody wanna go dreaming with me sometime? It's a fucking blast. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 33891652 Turkey 02/12/2013 02:51 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 33891652 No they won't... They don't know anything more than you and me and the astroDR. They just hope that it won't hit. Yes, actually people like me and those at NASA do know more than you. So why didn't you genious didn't estimate the actual size before? The size is irrelevant, but you can see the absolute magnitude figure (H) in the orbital elements that I calculated for it. Currently the absolute magnitude calculated is about 24.1 according to the minor planet center, about the same from NASA. Diameter = 1329/Sqrt(albedo) * 10^(-.2*H) All diameter estimates are based on an assumption of the asteroid's albedo. This generally ranges from about .05 to .25. If we go with an average of about .15, then the asteroid's diameter is about 51 meters. If we assume it's a very dark asteroid, about as dark as fresh asphalt with an albedo of 0.05, then the asteroid is potentially about 89 meters wide. We'll have a much firmer determination of the size from radar observations that will start on the 16th. Generally you can expect it to be less than 100 meters wide, nominally about 51 meters. Spaceweather may be weighing the various photometric measurements in some way that yields a brighter absolute magnitude however. OK, Dr, You still hope that it won't hit the earth after all that calculations..... |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 34088760 Portugal 02/12/2013 02:54 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Dr. Astro Senior Forum Moderator User ID: 4211721 United States 02/12/2013 02:55 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | So why didn't you genious didn't estimate the actual size before? The size is irrelevant, but you can see the absolute magnitude figure (H) in the orbital elements that I calculated for it. Currently the absolute magnitude calculated is about 24.1 according to the minor planet center, about the same from NASA. Diameter = 1329/Sqrt(albedo) * 10^(-.2*H) All diameter estimates are based on an assumption of the asteroid's albedo. This generally ranges from about .05 to .25. If we go with an average of about .15, then the asteroid's diameter is about 51 meters. If we assume it's a very dark asteroid, about as dark as fresh asphalt with an albedo of 0.05, then the asteroid is potentially about 89 meters wide. We'll have a much firmer determination of the size from radar observations that will start on the 16th. Generally you can expect it to be less than 100 meters wide, nominally about 51 meters. Spaceweather may be weighing the various photometric measurements in some way that yields a brighter absolute magnitude however. OK, Dr, You still hope that it won't hit the earth after all that calculations..... No, I know it won't. I don't "hope" it won't. That's for you to do since you haven't done the math. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 34254706 United Kingdom 02/12/2013 02:56 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I had another one of my infamous "There's a 1000ft. tsunami coming!" dreams AGAINNN lastnight. Quoting: Mister Obvious This time I was in a boat (why the fuck) and the classic flipping over of the boat started happening. Breaking my body on the ceiling, on the floor, water pouring in. Anybody wanna go dreaming with me sometime? It's a fucking blast. oh good God, is that a genuine offer? i'm THERE!!! |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 33417634 United States 02/12/2013 02:57 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I had another one of my infamous "There's a 1000ft. tsunami coming!" dreams AGAINNN lastnight. Quoting: Mister Obvious This time I was in a boat (why the fuck) and the classic flipping over of the boat started happening. Breaking my body on the ceiling, on the floor, water pouring in. Anybody wanna go dreaming with me sometime? It's a fucking blast. I dreamed I met a pterodactyl last night...weird |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 4608446 Canada 02/12/2013 02:58 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I wonder how that feels a planet hitting another one when you are on the opposid side of one. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 34250665 I would imagine that initially the impact would thrust the whole planet sideways several hundred or thousand miles flinging everything everywhere violently and then the ground would have the consistency of water from being pulverized,and then a giant super heated air blast thousands of degrees F. would circle the globe killing everything.And depending on the size of the other planet,probably would turn the crust and mantle of earth into molten magma.Not a good day. That is what happened after I ate some bad food the other day. Good times. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 33891652 Turkey 02/12/2013 02:58 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 33891652 So why didn't you genious didn't estimate the actual size before? The size is irrelevant, but you can see the absolute magnitude figure (H) in the orbital elements that I calculated for it. Currently the absolute magnitude calculated is about 24.1 according to the minor planet center, about the same from NASA. Diameter = 1329/Sqrt(albedo) * 10^(-.2*H) All diameter estimates are based on an assumption of the asteroid's albedo. This generally ranges from about .05 to .25. If we go with an average of about .15, then the asteroid's diameter is about 51 meters. If we assume it's a very dark asteroid, about as dark as fresh asphalt with an albedo of 0.05, then the asteroid is potentially about 89 meters wide. We'll have a much firmer determination of the size from radar observations that will start on the 16th. Generally you can expect it to be less than 100 meters wide, nominally about 51 meters. Spaceweather may be weighing the various photometric measurements in some way that yields a brighter absolute magnitude however. OK, Dr, You still hope that it won't hit the earth after all that calculations..... No, I know it won't. I don't "hope" it won't. That's for you to do since you haven't done the math. Dr, you'll be hero, but you don't know anything at the moment. |
Waterbug User ID: 1295673 United States 02/12/2013 02:58 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The bigger this thing actually is, the more Earth pulls it closer... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 7707807 Isn't it just the opposite? M1 attracts M2 and M2 attracts M1 reciprocally So if M2 mass was larger then the attraction is greater between the two. Negated by increased momentum. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 31781644 United States 02/12/2013 02:59 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Dr. Astro Senior Forum Moderator User ID: 4211721 United States 02/12/2013 02:59 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Dr. Astro The size is irrelevant, but you can see the absolute magnitude figure (H) in the orbital elements that I calculated for it. Currently the absolute magnitude calculated is about 24.1 according to the minor planet center, about the same from NASA. Diameter = 1329/Sqrt(albedo) * 10^(-.2*H) All diameter estimates are based on an assumption of the asteroid's albedo. This generally ranges from about .05 to .25. If we go with an average of about .15, then the asteroid's diameter is about 51 meters. If we assume it's a very dark asteroid, about as dark as fresh asphalt with an albedo of 0.05, then the asteroid is potentially about 89 meters wide. We'll have a much firmer determination of the size from radar observations that will start on the 16th. Generally you can expect it to be less than 100 meters wide, nominally about 51 meters. Spaceweather may be weighing the various photometric measurements in some way that yields a brighter absolute magnitude however. OK, Dr, You still hope that it won't hit the earth after all that calculations..... No, I know it won't. I don't "hope" it won't. That's for you to do since you haven't done the math. Dr, you'll be hero, but you don't know anything at the moment. Evidently I know a lot more than you at the moment. I've done the calculations for myself. It will not hit. The uncertainty region of the asteroid's position does not even come close to overlapping earth. There is no possibility of impact. |
Dr. Astro Senior Forum Moderator User ID: 4211721 United States 02/12/2013 03:00 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 34240632 France 02/12/2013 03:00 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The bigger this thing actually is, the more Earth pulls it closer... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 7707807 Isn't it just the opposite? M1 attracts M2 and M2 attracts M1 reciprocally So if M2 mass was larger then the attraction is greater between the two. Negated by increased momentum. no every mass fall at the same speed, it will change it's speed and trajectory after passing earth, but maybe not that much |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 33891652 Turkey 02/12/2013 03:02 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 33891652 OK, Dr, You still hope that it won't hit the earth after all that calculations..... No, I know it won't. I don't "hope" it won't. That's for you to do since you haven't done the math. Dr, you'll be hero, but you don't know anything at the moment. Evidently I know a lot more than you at the moment. I've done the calculations for myself. It will not hit. The uncertainty region of the asteroid's position does not even come close to overlapping earth. There is no possibility of impact. |
Waterbug User ID: 1295673 United States 02/12/2013 03:03 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | M1 attracts M2 and M2 attracts M1 reciprocally So if M2 mass was larger then the attraction is greater between the two. Negated by increased momentum. no every mass fall at the same speed, it will change it's speed and trajectory after passing earth, but maybe not that much It is moving laterally, not falling.. speed times mass=momentum or force of impact..the earth falls out from under it due to the curvature of the planet. Last Edited by Waterbug on 02/12/2013 03:04 PM |
El Tiburon User ID: 28375544 United States 02/12/2013 03:04 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | If we don't know the size, we don't know the mass and we don't know the composition. Therefore we can only guess at it's trajectory once it interacts with our Earth-Moon system... I would hope the margin of error includes possible extremes and are not anchored in a guessed median. Maybe IRAN will save us with it's new Space Plane? |
pmb1 User ID: 32803227 United States 02/12/2013 03:08 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Dr. Astro Senior Forum Moderator User ID: 4211721 United States 02/12/2013 03:09 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | If we don't know the size, we don't know the mass and we don't know the composition. Therefore we can only guess at it's trajectory once it interacts with our Earth-Moon system... Quoting: El Tiburon No, its mass and composition are irrelevant to its trajectory. Its mass is negligible relative to earth, and it will experience the same amount of acceleration from earth's gravity regardless of how much mass it has. |
SeanoftheDead User ID: 1454349 Canada 02/12/2013 03:09 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I had another one of my infamous "There's a 1000ft. tsunami coming!" dreams AGAINNN lastnight. Quoting: Mister Obvious This time I was in a boat (why the fuck) and the classic flipping over of the boat started happening. Breaking my body on the ceiling, on the floor, water pouring in. Anybody wanna go dreaming with me sometime? It's a fucking blast. I just got chills reading about your dream. *shivers* |
tommar User ID: 34229974 Croatia 02/12/2013 03:10 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | M1 attracts M2 and M2 attracts M1 reciprocally So if M2 mass was larger then the attraction is greater between the two. Negated by increased momentum. no every mass fall at the same speed, it will change it's speed and trajectory after passing earth, but maybe not that much 5-7-10-12-15-25-32 |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1335118 Netherlands 02/12/2013 03:21 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 22826717 United States 02/12/2013 03:23 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | If we don't know the size, we don't know the mass and we don't know the composition. Therefore we can only guess at it's trajectory once it interacts with our Earth-Moon system... Quoting: El Tiburon No, its mass and composition are irrelevant to its trajectory. Its mass is negligible relative to earth, and it will experience the same amount of acceleration from earth's gravity regardless of how much mass it has. Hey, Astro: My cat just threw up a hairball. Any chance there's a correlation between that and the possibility of Asteroid 2012 DA14 hitting the Earth? |
Requiemdream (Ghost) User ID: 34068611 United States 02/12/2013 03:34 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I should have a hell of a view.... fridaynight Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1335118 I'm starting the nightshift and I'm 5 stories high It's Friday in the NL already? You are high! Perpetually dumbfounded. “I have learned now that while those who speak about one's miseries usually hurt, those who keep silence hurt more." C.S. Lewis “Sticks and stones may break your bones but words can break hearts.” Tim Minchin |
S0L4RN1GHTM4R3 User ID: 20843469 United States 02/12/2013 03:39 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 34238343 United States 02/12/2013 03:51 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I have a close family member who is a retired engineer (Redstone). He would never be so bold as to make 100% predictions or say things like "math never lies". Anytime we have talked about events over the years he would always put his .02 in but throw out a caveat about unexpected variables. Anytime you make a prediction based on a mathematical model, you cannot completely predict the variable that nature plays. If you could, then we would have 100% forecasts every time. So, I'm a little leery when someone says something will "never" happen as opposed to saying something is "unlikely" to happen. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 15908726 United Kingdom 02/12/2013 03:56 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 34246598 Italy 02/12/2013 03:56 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1018748 United States 02/12/2013 03:57 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1018748 United States 02/12/2013 03:59 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |