I am the real John Lear...ask me a question | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1372235 Australia 03/08/2014 04:27 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
johnlear (OP) User ID: 49012019 United States 03/10/2014 06:12 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | John is here. But not feeling at the top of his form. I do read everything. My best to all. Live your life with integrity; and without envy hate or greed. Express your love to your family every day. Thats all you have to do in this life other than doing things you like to do. |
701st User ID: 33082108 Germany 03/10/2014 07:01 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Hang in there John! All of us have a low from time to time... I personally like to think then about infinite Universe of ours, full of life and fancy stuff we are going to discover when we are free from the prison down here. Thanks to people like you and Lou :) No worries! |
Space Ghost User ID: 54293544 United States 03/10/2014 07:35 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
John DOnson User ID: 55210760 United States 03/10/2014 07:43 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
johnlear (OP) User ID: 49012019 United States 03/10/2014 10:56 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Are we searching in the wrong place or did this plane continue flying? Thanks in advance! I don’t know what happened to the plane. However, on all new aircraft there is, I believe, data transition module known only to the airline and the aircraft manufacturer, in this case Boeing, that as long as there is power on the ship, it transmits various engine and other information directly by satellite to the manufacturer. This data cannot by control by the pilots. This data includes the GPS position. So somebody knows where the airplane is or was. This information cannot be released to the public as it is part of an anti-jacking program that is kept secret from any would-be hijackers. Somebody knows whether it crashed or not and where the airplane was when it lost complete power. But its not me. Live your life with integrity; and without envy hate or greed. Express your love to your family every day. Thats all you have to do in this life other than doing things you like to do. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 39139288 Australia 03/11/2014 03:58 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | All the best to you JL. You got plenty of folks here who think the world of you, and your inspiring ideas, and fantastic tales. ------------------------- The scuttle butt is that the plane landed without power in China, and pretty much everyone is OK. Why there hasn't been contact is another weird question to answer. In any regard, I truly hope the folks are OK, or, if it went down, it was quick. |
Deep Throat User ID: 55467035 Belgium 03/11/2014 02:10 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 51189805 United States 03/12/2014 03:35 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Good afternoon John, I've been an avid follower for a couple years now and find your information fascinating. I was really hoping you, or someone else with sufficient knowledge of moon structures, could answer this: Today I was sitting in a bar for lunch and struck up a conversation with a few people and I mentioned based on research I had done that the moon was littered with ancient artifacts/structures. This led to did we really go to the moon. At this point one of the gentlemen in the conversation mentioned he had traveled as a student to the Palomar Observatory in college for a class and that they looked at the moon and could see the leftovers from the Apollo missions clear as day. So my question is if these telescopes can see the moon so clearly why hasn't anyone reported the structures on the moon? If they exist? I believe they do but wouldn't these telescopes be able to clearly see the larger structures? Surely the TPTB don't have control over every single observatory. Please answer this because it is the question I get asked from my sheep friends who think I'm crazy and I do not have a good answer. Thank you! |
Wookiee666 User ID: 55286102 United States 03/12/2014 03:46 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Mr. Leer, please explain to us what you think could have happened to the Malaysian Airlines flight. No electronic trace, no wreckage, no plane. Quoting: johnlear Are we searching in the wrong place or did this plane continue flying? Thanks in advance! I don’t know what happened to the plane. However, on all new aircraft there is, I believe, data transition module known only to the airline and the aircraft manufacturer, in this case Boeing, that as long as there is power on the ship, it transmits various engine and other information directly by satellite to the manufacturer. This data cannot by control by the pilots. This data includes the GPS position. So somebody knows where the airplane is or was. This information cannot be released to the public as it is part of an anti-jacking program that is kept secret from any would-be hijackers. Somebody knows whether it crashed or not and where the airplane was when it lost complete power. But its not me. Warning: JustSomeGuy_42 is a publicly confessed unvaxxed neophiliac . If the number 666 is considered evil. then technically, 25.8069758 is the root of all evil. |
awoken1 User ID: 44078936 United Kingdom 03/12/2014 04:10 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 55529565 United States 03/12/2014 09:33 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Mr. Leer, please explain to us what you think could have happened to the Malaysian Airlines flight. No electronic trace, no wreckage, no plane. Quoting: johnlear Are we searching in the wrong place or did this plane continue flying? Thanks in advance! I don’t know what happened to the plane. However, on all new aircraft there is, I believe, data transition module known only to the airline and the aircraft manufacturer, in this case Boeing, that as long as there is power on the ship, it transmits various engine and other information directly by satellite to the manufacturer. This data cannot by control by the pilots. This data includes the GPS position. So somebody knows where the airplane is or was. This information cannot be released to the public as it is part of an anti-jacking program that is kept secret from any would-be hijackers. Somebody knows whether it crashed or not and where the airplane was when it lost complete power. But its not me. Hello Mr. Lear. What do you think about this? Thread: Image of Missing Plane found by Mike Seberger with Tomnod ? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 55524305 Australia 03/12/2014 09:54 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 357364Yeah, this please... This really needs an answer^^^^^^^ Sleeper told me this. His real name is Lou Baldin. He has 3 books but the most interesting one is 'In League with a UFO' which tells the true story of what happened after Roswell with the craft that was recovered. Well the if "SLEEPER" told you this, it must be true. Silly me. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 48136458 United States 03/13/2014 02:23 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 48136458 United States 03/13/2014 02:33 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Hi John, I would like to know what you make of the Qaballah, Alchemy, Hermeticism, etc there seems to be a lot of crossover between the spiritual science you speak off and the theories extrapolated by Qabalists. Mainly the denizens of other worlds as gatekeepers or classes of angels if you would use their terminology, each planet possessing a spirit and name over it with a definite function in sustaining life on earth; also with life on their own levels but in different reality freqencies (multi-dimensional sitting on top of what we see), multi-leveled correspondences between the planets, the soul and the main goal of life being that of prepping a soul to graduate through connection with the over-soul/higher self/guardian angel. Thanks |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 39453096 Canada 03/13/2014 03:22 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Is this just a symptom of our corrupt political system, or are they being placed to make humans accepting of alien overlords? Thanks John, I always listen when you are on the radio. |
Deu5vult User ID: 1529081 United Kingdom 03/14/2014 08:45 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Good afternoon John, Quoting: Anonymous Coward 51189805 I've been an avid follower for a couple years now and find your information fascinating. I was really hoping you, or someone else with sufficient knowledge of moon structures, could answer this: Today I was sitting in a bar for lunch and struck up a conversation with a few people and I mentioned based on research I had done that the moon was littered with ancient artifacts/structures. This led to did we really go to the moon. At this point one of the gentlemen in the conversation mentioned he had traveled as a student to the Palomar Observatory in college for a class and that they looked at the moon and could see the leftovers from the Apollo missions clear as day. So my question is if these telescopes can see the moon so clearly why hasn't anyone reported the structures on the moon? If they exist? I believe they do but wouldn't these telescopes be able to clearly see the larger structures? Surely the TPTB don't have control over every single observatory. Please answer this because it is the question I get asked from my sheep friends who think I'm crazy and I do not have a good answer. Thank you! There is no telescope in existence large enough to pick out individual structures of any kind on the moon. The gentleman who claims he "could see the leftovers from the Apollo missions clear as day" from the Palomar Observatory was lying to you. Read up on Angular Resolution for further clarification. |
Deu5vult User ID: 1529081 United Kingdom 03/14/2014 09:00 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | John, What is the meaning behind these two contradictory statements of yours? Taken from your affidavit: -------- "The argument that the energy of the mass of the Boeing 767 at a speed of 540 mph fails because: a. No Boeing 767 could attain that speed at 1000 feet above sea level because of parasite drag which doubles with velocity and parasite power which cubes with velocity. b. The fan portion of the engine is not designed to accept the volume of dense air at that altitude and speed. -------- Taken from one of your posts on another conspiracy forum: --------- "A Boeing 767 could attain the speed of 500 mph at 700 feet above the ground but that speed puts it well above Vmo/Mmo." --------- I'd like to know what changed your mind. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 39139288 Australia 03/14/2014 09:47 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Big difference between 'attain' and 'maintain'. We only saw a few seconds of video, but the (fake) reality would have the aircraft travelling at those supposed speeds for a long period of time. IMPOSSIBRUUUUU!!! John, Quoting: Deu5vult What is the meaning behind these two contradictory statements of yours? Taken from your affidavit: -------- "The argument that the energy of the mass of the Boeing 767 at a speed of 540 mph fails because: a. No Boeing 767 could attain that speed at 1000 feet above sea level because of parasite drag which doubles with velocity and parasite power which cubes with velocity. b. The fan portion of the engine is not designed to accept the volume of dense air at that altitude and speed. -------- Taken from one of your posts on another conspiracy forum: --------- "A Boeing 767 could attain the speed of 500 mph at 700 feet above the ground but that speed puts it well above Vmo/Mmo." --------- I'd like to know what changed your mind. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 55590977 Indonesia 03/14/2014 09:55 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 55590977 Indonesia 03/14/2014 09:55 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 55590977 Indonesia 03/14/2014 09:56 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The MSM and alternative media read from parallel scripts, and are attempting to prevent a spooking of the markets, too early. Notice the alternative media has preached: economic reset since 9/11. This plays on the hopes of the obedient zombies on TV and the markets, which still feeds the machine, or old world order. The assets delivering the lies are deemed antiquated as well, and will be eliminated in the purge. There will be no continuity of government, as stated w/in the protocols of the technocray. |
Dr.RAM-fan User ID: 55589431 Hong Kong 03/14/2014 10:15 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | John, My friend the physicist, Dr Richard Alan Miller, says that he thinks a new "weapon" might have been tested - One that can disable a "black box" That might explain the presence of those 20 technicians (either working FOR the weapon-maker, or for a rival firm.) That might also explain why the black box (I know it is really orange) disappeared from radar screens. What do you make of this theory? |
701st User ID: 33082108 Germany 03/14/2014 04:59 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
johnlear (OP) User ID: 49012019 United States 03/14/2014 06:42 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | John, What is the meaning behind these two contradictory statements of yours? Taken from your affidavit: -------- "The argument that the energy of the mass of the Boeing 767 at a speed of 540 mph fails because: a. No Boeing 767 could attain that speed at 1000 feet above sea level because of parasite drag which doubles with velocity and parasite power which cubes with velocity. b. The fan portion of the engine is not designed to accept the volume of dense air at that altitude and speed. -------- Taken from one of your posts on another conspiracy forum: --------- "A Boeing 767 could attain the speed of 500 mph at 700 feet above the ground but that speed puts it well above Vmo/Mmo." --------- I'd like to know what changed your mind. I should have written: "If Boeing 767 could attain the speed of 540 mph (425 knots) at 700 feet above the ground but that speed puts it well above Vmo/Mmo." It would actually be 65 knots above 360 knots Vmo and therefore be uncontrollable. --------- Live your life with integrity; and without envy hate or greed. Express your love to your family every day. Thats all you have to do in this life other than doing things you like to do. |
johnlear (OP) User ID: 49012019 United States 03/14/2014 07:44 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Reponse to afternoon John, I've been an avid follower for a couple years now and find your information fascinating. I was really hoping you, or someone else with sufficient knowledge of moon structures, could answer this: Today I was sitting in a bar for lunch and struck up a conversation with a few people and I mentioned based on research I had done that the moon was littered with ancient artifacts/structures. This led to did we really go to the moon. At this point one of the gentlemen in the conversation mentioned he had traveled as a student to the Palomar Observatory in college for a class and that they looked at the moon and could see the leftovers from the Apollo missions clear as day. So my question is if these telescopes can see the moon so clearly why hasn't anyone reported the structures on the moon? If they exist? I believe they do but wouldn't these telescopes be able to clearly see the larger structures? Surely the TPTB don't have control over every single observatory. Please answer this because it is the question I get asked from my sheep friends who think I'm crazy and I do not have a good answer. Thank you! Its unlikely that anybody was allowed to look through the 200 inch telescope at Palomar. Looking through any of the smaller telescope would not show any remnants from Apollo. Many of have tried over the years to get ANY photos of the moon out of Palomar and its always been the same answer: NO. The people at Palomar say that the photos of the moon are under lock and key for many years to come. As to photos seen since the Apollo Missions…impossible. It may be that Palomar has a program where they pretend they are looking at the moon and substitute a smaller scope and put in fake remnants. Very easy to do. The facts are that no Apollo mission ever went to, orbited or landed on the moon. There are hundreds of reasons for this the most plausible being the debunking of Newton’s Universal Law of Gravitation by Pari Spolter in her Gravitational Force of the Sun (Orb Publishing Company 1993). Simply put the gravitational force is independent of the attracted body so there is no basis for Newton’s assumption that gravitational force is due to and is proportional to the quantity or density of matter. Since Einstein based his theory of relativity both general and special on Newton’s Universal law of gravitational force then we must discard just about everything that Einstein proposed. As we must discard all of the CERN’s nonsense of Hadrons and Bosons (neither of which exist) except for the Italian who proposed that CERN proved matter travelling faster than the speed of light was possible. All the best Live your life with integrity; and without envy hate or greed. Express your love to your family every day. Thats all you have to do in this life other than doing things you like to do. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 55613274 Hong Kong 03/14/2014 10:00 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | John, Quoting: Dr.RAM-fan 55589431 My friend the physicist, Dr Richard Alan Miller, says that he thinks a new "weapon" might have been tested - One that can disable a "black box" That might explain the presence of those 20 technicians (either working FOR the weapon-maker, or for a rival firm.) That might also explain why the black box (I know it is really orange) disappeared from radar screens. What do you make of this theory? (not only Dr Miller thinks this): !!!!! Alfred Webre interviews Leuren Moret: Flight 370 was US weapons demo for Putin; Payback for Tribunal vs Israel, US/UK Leuren Moret: Flight 370 downing was U.S. Navy Energy weapons demo for Putin; Payback for Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Tribunal verdicts vs. Israel, US and UK = = VANCOUVER, BC – In an exclusive EcologyNews.com interview with Alfred Lambremont Webre, radiation and directed energy expert Leuren Moret, MA, PhD ABT, revealed that Malaysia Airlines flight MH370 of March 8, 2014 was, by the evidence, shot down by a newly unveiled U.S. Navy Laser Weapons System (LaWS). According to Leuren Moret, the location of the downed Malaysia Flight 370 as first confirmed by an admiral of the Vietnamese armed forces was correct, while the U.S. and Malaysian media have published a continual stream of disinformation as a diversion to cover-up this military false flag operation by the U.S. Navy. Motives for the false flag operation – Why? > [link to jhaines6.wordpress.com] |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 55613274 Hong Kong 03/14/2014 10:02 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | John, What do you think of Dr Miller's view that: The Web is conscious Thread: The Internet is conscious, says Dr Richard Alan Miller |
Adam Josh User ID: 55081224 Canada 03/15/2014 12:21 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | John Lear, Long time no talk. Good to see you back! My question is, are you and Canada's Former Defence Minister Paul Hellyer best friends!? All the best, - Adam Josh [link to www.adamjosh.com] |
Rod1960 User ID: 55432085 United States 03/15/2014 12:58 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |