Calling LIGHTWORKERS! A Meeting Place !

This is awesome - as you move your cursor around the picture, it has a "flutter effect" on the screen.
[link to tv.repubblica.it]

This is awesome - as you move your cursor around the picture, it has a "flutter effect" on the screen.
[link to tv.repubblica.it]

Hello, Luke! Welcome!

I, too, have awakened with very intense, documentary-style voices in my head. No, I'm not schizophrenic (I don't think, anyways), but very these voices are very *teacher-like* or authoritarian-like. The lessons seem way over my head and come from a male voice. Unfortunately, I can't recall a single verse or paragraph that I hear as it fades away faster than my conscious mind can grasp. It's frustrating. It almost feels like a *down-loading* of info, which sometimes makes me feel like we ARE in a Matrix-type reality. Very strange, to be sure.

Sometimes, the communication is verbal (loud or quiet); other times, it's through signs or songs or symbols, or events such as doors of opportunity opening.

As we have discussed here many times, if you were a Creator what sort of relationship would YOU like to have with your creation? One of hero-worship or one of friendship? The Universe is our friend and it wishes to support us at every level.

It doesn't know what you are going to think/feel or do. It only knows how it can respond.

Love to you, dear Luke,
Div
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

We are discussing racism, sexism, ageism and the like in my "Intro to Sociology" class. Many feel more education on these topics will remove these obstacles. While I agree that inspiration to have an open heart and accept others equally is for the better, I disagree about the type of education I've personally experienced to alleviate these fear-inspired "isms". I find that this tends to lead to more definition in these lines that often separate us by drowning us in a sea of political correctness and the like... By making us MORE aware of the illusion of being "separate" and "of a different source".

But how do we get to the point where we stop even seeing this way??? Stop trying to get to the point of "I, a Caucasian-American woman, see that African-American man as my equal," to "This being is equal," without the classifiers that further separate us??? Anyone as the teacher tends to put up a discussion on our online class database for class topics...?

Much Love! Still waiting on the Mayan pictures.

O!

SAINT GERMAIN COMMENTS ON THE TIBETAN SITUATION

Channeled by Aruna

March 25, 2008



I AM Saint Germain.

My decision to address the Tibetan conflict is for my chelas to become more conscious of ALL the claims of deceit in their daily awareness. This includes the common deceits they maintain about themselves. No deceit “out there” can give more awareness than those examples of mental deceptions being mirrored to chelas right now.



Tibet cannot come to terms with the Chinese government as long as either maintains a control mentality. Control of anything is negative. Decisions made to control anything contribute darkness to the mass consciousness. Mass consciousness does not create darkness; decisions made in the minds of men delete man’s ability to greatly increase light. Control deletes all the light being created in monasteries and allows the death of awareness.



Chinese methods of control are no more negative than control in other areas of daily life; i.e. when ego mind defeats the creative expression of the divine I AM nature in one man. Only when man’s negativity is decoded can man come to terms with the negative ego. The negative ego is being mirrored in any condition where control is demanded.



Peace within can counter this darkness. Man can delete density by being less deceitful about his own negativity and giving his mind daily doses of mental neutrality. Claiming to be a gift of light and condemning ANYONE or ANYTHING is not in alignment. Nothing is dark and nothing is light in the highest awareness – all is loved equally as it is. Peace comes with love, not concerns about what the mind determines to be dark.



The Dalai Lama does not condemn China. Nor does he desire control. His example is God’s divine allowance of whatever man designs. Condemning anyone is not consciousness complaining; it is merely an ego’s opinion.



Condemnation of Tibet cannot alter Chinese opinion. Condemnation deletes neutrality. Only neutrality can alter mass consciousness with clarity about desire and control. Neutrality must be chosen, in any situation, as the way to defeat darkness. An example of alignment with God’s divine acceptance can begin with one individual. Bless the man in orange robes who shines his light so brightly for all to gain awareness by.



Can Tibet give the world the ability to see its own deceit? Can one man’s neutrality give the world an example of divine grace? Can the Dalai Lama’s neutrality be recognized as an example of the divine consciousness in man? Only when this can be the common awareness, can anything be done to change the mental decisions of anyone in control mode.



I AM THAT I AM

Saint Germain

[link to goddesslight.multiply.com]

Car i didnt understood why u separated Lea from any body else... saiyng we and them.... wtF***?

She will never post here again cause of u... and cause She felted kinda rejected Man...

Can u please repair it C ???? or maiby a miss understood...



Cosmo, BE love and compassion in EVERY word you say.

We are One ...
We are Love ...
We are Peace ...
Always.

No harm or judgment was intended for Lea nor was any taken by her... I don't write Caruso's posts, and we do not always agree on what is being said... we are two different people, but be assured that she is loved very much by Caruso and she knows. Thank you for your concern and caring.

We are all going through many changes right now... allow ALL to BE at each own pace.

Peace. Love. You are broth.
xana

dont be peace off with me... no reason...
C need to apologise or explain
what does he meant than?????????????''

Car i didnt understood why u separated Lea from any body else... saiyng we and them.... wtF***?

She will never post here again cause of u... and cause She felted kinda rejected Man...

Can u please repair it C ???? or maiby a miss understood...

.


Hi, Cosmo.

Boy, you are trigger happy.

You misread my post. Read again. It was 'you' and 'us'.






.caruso

There are those in our midst who seem to believe that, once again, man is on the thresh-hold of discovering the answers to the final secrets of the Universe. This is undoubtedly an echo from the final years of the nineteenth century but, after that period of premature claims, one might have expected a little more reticence from the modern godfathers of world science.

However, sensibly keeping quiet does not seem a virtue of these people, to the extent that, on two recent Monday evenings on British television, the public has been given the opportunity to participate in the life and achievements of the ‘Master of the Universe’, Stephen Hawking. While no-one can but admire his courage and tenacity in the face of extreme physical handicap, one must question the power and importance of his scientific achievements. Indeed, when it comes to discovering the secrets of the Universe, precisely what are his achievements?

Many will be horrified at these words and the seeming impertinence of this question, but it is a question which must be asked, and answered, not because of Hawking the man, but because of what he represents. He is, in fact, in the eyes of many, the figurehead of that largely faceless body which controls what is, and is not, contained in that body of scientific knowledge which may be termed conventional wisdom; that body of scientific knowledge which is simply not open to question. Many topics are included in this but those of immediate concern here are probably the theories of relativity (both special and general), the theory of the ‘big bang’, the theory of black holes, etc.

As Stephen Crothers has recently pointed out, this final topic should really be a non-starter, based as it is on an incorrect statement of Schwartzschild’s solution of the Einstein field equations. However, again as Stephen has pointed out, even the incorrectly quoted ‘solution’ is included in, and protected by, conventional wisdom. One further surprising aspect of much of conventional wisdom is that the originators of much of this body of knowledge would have welcomed discussion and even criticism, provided that criticism was constructive. In this day and age, however, people who disagree with conventional wisdom do not face discussion and constructive criticism; rather they are either quietly ignored or destroyed. The first of these is possibly the more destructive action occurring in modern science because if something is quietly ignored, it gains no publicity and so remains unknown, except to the favoured few. This brings me directly to the whole idea of an electric universe.
Electric Universe - a natural alternative?

I first encountered the notion when reading the small book Rival Theories of Cosmology, which was published by Oxford University Press in 1960 and contains a ‘symposium and discussion of modern theories of the structure of the universe’. Originally there had been three talks on BBC radio and to these had been added a short discussion of the main points advanced in favour of relativistic theories of the universe (essentially what we now know as the big bang), the steady state theory, and an electric universe. Interestingly, there seemed no major disagreement between the advocates of the latter two theories, but both were at odds with the relativistic theories. To some extent, such is still the case but possibly the divide is increasing.

More recently, I have read The Electric Universe and have been further shocked by what I’ve read. Shocked because I was made even more aware of the power being exercised by the scientific mafia to protect accepted theories; shocked because, although I was aware of the work of Kristian Birkeland through contacts in Scandinavia, I realised that he was totally unknown to colleagues, some of whom work in plasma physics. To me, all this raises grave questions about the conduct of modern science.

However, another point which emerged very forcibly from my reading was the realisation that, although the conventional ‘big bang’ school rules out all interference from outside and demands that everyone describe everything in terms of the gravitational force, the electric universe adherents, while being able to describe so much, so accurately, make no attempt to rule out gravity completely even though it is such a weak force by comparison. This open-mindedness and unwillingness to completely ignore something is surely an indication of the true way of science.

When all is said and done, man produces models to describe something which, whatever else it may be, is certainly not man-made. All these man-made models are approximate. What else could we expect from our relatively puny human intellect? Nevertheless, because of all this, nothing should be thrown away. As someone once said of the conflict between the big bang and steady state theories for the origin of the universe, probably the true answer will involve aspects of both.
The power of math

One further point needs stressing, I think. I was initially trained as a mathematician, although my degree did involve two years of subsidiary physics. Over the years, I have come to realise more and more the power of mathematics but also the fact that that power can be misused. Mathematics is a beautiful subject and can be studied, in its own right, as a highly worthwhile intellectual pursuit. However, mathematics has a second role as the language of physics and, in that rôle, it is simply a tool which must always remain subservient to the physics. If the mathematics throws up a result which does not accord with physical reality, it should be studied carefully but not accepted immediately unless a genuine physical interpretation can be found; the physics must never ever be made to fit the mathematics!

In our modern world, though, the mathematics being used to attempt to describe physical reality is becoming ever more complicated so that only the favoured few can follow. String theory is a perfect example of this, where many of the personnel involved are abstract pure mathematicians with little or no real interest in physics and yet huge claims are made of the advances in physical understanding coming from that area. It seems that many are claiming to be close to establishing a theory of everything.

What is meant by this is not completely clear but presumably it involves a grand unification of the fundamental forces. This I find intriguing since, as yet, no-one even knows exactly what a force is. Newton’s second law of motion is said to define force but actually it only explains what a force does! This is true of all forces; what they do is well known but precisely what they are remains a mystery. No; whatever extreme claims are made, the truth is that there is much to learn and discover and real advances will be made by people working together, rather than competing with one another aggressively.

It seems it is time for all clear thinking true scientists to band together to oppose the present day prostitution of science. The scientific mafia may hold the power of when and where people can, and cannot, publish; they may hold most of the research purse strings; but, in the end, the search for the truth must, and will, triumph!

Dr. Jeremy Dunning-Davies is a Senior Lecturer in Theoretical Physics in the Department of Physics at the University of Hull, England. He is Chairman of both the Santilli - Einstein Academy of Sciences, and the Santilli - Galilei Association on Scientific Truth and is also a Fellow of the Royal Astronomical Society.

Dr. Dunning-Davies has recently launched a book titled "Exploding a Myth: 'Conventional Wisdom' or Scientific Truth?" and published by Horwood Publishing Limited in England.

[link to www.thunderbolts.info]


A very important post, dear femto...many thanks for this.


Power, Peace and Love!
Div
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Peace within can counter this darkness. Man can delete density by being less deceitful about his own negativity and giving his mind daily doses of mental neutrality. Claiming to be a gift of light and condemning ANYONE or ANYTHING is not in alignment. Nothing is dark and nothing is light in the highest awareness – all is loved equally as it is. Peace comes with love, not concerns about what the mind determines to be dark.





THANK YOU AC 399098 for posting this channeling through ARUNA March 25th 2008 - Much wisdom here. I do quote St.G a lot and I love how he can come through using modern day language and also can use old English in his teachings to us. That is St. G - Thanks again Much Love to you

We always judge that which is different, just sometimes we don't catch ourselves doing it. Me i am more guilty than anyone here but i do see myself in you and a note from myself be careful with self love cause it can make you blind to the outside where others are trying to follow. Because we see what we want to see!

Lea wont be back not even i can change that one and i am with her. Shes been through a lot in life and she is like that Poets of the fall song. "Sweet as an angel sings, she gives though she has none left but the last one, free, unhesitatingly." Life has taken, No people have taken so much from her and yet she will she put others above herself. Me i took the most once upon a time and i carry that on my heart so i am writing this as a warning to others on the path...

Infinite Diversity in Infinite Combinations....

there are lights out there that do not look like much to others but they are brighter than a million stars.

and I for one Bow to Lea and what she stands for. For she has taught me once again what it means to be on this path, for it is the path of the heart in all its light and wonder.

Peace


I am sorry to hear that Lea's feelings have been hurt by my words.

Now, that out, please, let me quickly explain what I meant:


We are on the Lightworkers forum. The forum on which we grind back and forth concept of self-love and repercussion of self-love misused.

WE here know most of us what I said, and what I mean by self love.

The words I sent to lea was the words I felt should be spoken.
I just hope Lea will have a moment, in front of the mirror, moment long enough to see her own beauty in it and
recognise denial for the MAKER's PERFECTION.


Lea is a genius in her own rights, and when someone mention that, she's offended. That wasn't my goal. I didn't have one.


Ebidah, we are ALL on the razor edge of tremendous changes.

The only way those scared will feel confident, is by others' support.
We do not unfortunately have time to dilly-daddle and go to basics anymore.

We are ALL one, so if I offended one of myself,
I profoundly apologize.






.caruso

Lea wont be back



...oh Ebidah...i do hope this is not true...though i respect her right to choose...i will miss her holy presence and wish for this mis-communication to be transmuted into ever more light and love...bringing forth more heavenly presence on earth...

Lea wont be back



...oh Ebidah...i do hope this is not true...though i respect her right to choose...i will miss her holy presence and wish for this mis-communication to be transmuted into ever more light and love...bringing forth more heavenly presence on earth...





1st mistake:

Why dont u show your self????

Who are U???

Xana??

NICE BOY LUKE - I was just reading your night time experience of the voices. When I lived in Canada, one night I heard a voice speak to me when I was asleep ( but it was probably in that hypnogenic state - half asleep and half awake, which is when you hear and see things) - anyway the voice sounded quite loud and as if echoing from a far distance . I have since read that the echo effect is because it is travelling through dimensions - The voice said to me " Beverley would you be happier living anywhere else?" It was definitely a teacher and guide I knew that. I am quite a restless soul and move around a lot but of course one always moves thinking that circumstances will be better in a new place. I do know I was being told that the PEACE was within myself and that is what I was instructed to find. I do still move but actually I notice now that where I go there is a spin off for others and I am not running so much as following energy. I am motivated differently now - comes with getting older I guess.!! My family does not understand it - but I JUST GO WITH THE FLOW NOW .

Mig. Please listen to me .

Please let it drop. Whether c is right or wrong, it ain't your place to step in. Takin the vibe here too low, for no good reason.

Let them work it out and let's get down to what we do best.

O K my beloved friend? Things will settle themselves, they always do.

Peace.

Lea wont be back



...oh Ebidah...i do hope this is not true...though i respect her right to choose...i will miss her holy presence and wish for this mis-communication to be transmuted into ever more light and love...bringing forth more heavenly presence on earth...





1st mistake:

Why dont u show your self????

Who are U???

Xana??


...what self do you want me to show miguel...

...why are you so angry...accusing of a mistake...

...i was addressing Ebidah in the quoted post...responding to his expression which said that our dear Lea was gone...

...perhaps to you my nameless choice is a mistake...i would prefer if we would all take off the mask and be One...no longer hiding behind names and avatars...but that is just my preference...