The biggest blunder in the church for years!! The Paul Deception!

Please provide scripture...

Otherwise, you will be cooking and frying and crying in hell forever and ever!!

The Great and Magnificent Super Michael 4Q529,

Who do YOU say that Jesus Christ is?

Read the reply of Jesus to the Sadducees in the Gospel of Matthew and the Gospel of Luke for the explanation of the term "the resurrection". (See, also, Chapter 27, verses 52-53 of the Gospel of Matthew.)

Read the Revelation of John for the term "synagogue of Satan".

Then use your brain.

Michael

Read the reply of Jesus to the Sadducees in the Gospel of Matthew and the Gospel of Luke for the explanation of the term "the resurrection". (See, also, Chapter 27, verses 52-53 of the Gospel of Matthew.)

Read the Revelation of John for the term "synagogue of Satan".

Then use your brain.

Michael

Who do YOU say that Mohammed is...

Who testified that Jesus was the messiah?

What makes the most difference about both Jesus and Mohammed is not who they were, but what they taught.

Michael

Who do YOU say that Mohammed is...

Who testified that Jesus was the messiah?

What makes the most difference about both Jesus and Mohammed is not who they were, but what they taught.

Michael

Because there are slight differences in words between languages.

There are not different books proclaiming different messages.

Can you understand this?

But there are different Bibles that are using the aame langauge.

Read the reply of Jesus to the Sadducees in the Gospel of Matthew and the Gospel of Luke for the explanation of the term "the resurrection". (See, also, Chapter 27, verses 52-53 of the Gospel of Matthew.)

Read the Revelation of John for the term "synagogue of Satan".

Then use your brain.

Michael

Please tell us, did the very Son of God forget to tell us something? So much so that he needed to send yet another prophet? A prophet that denied that Jesus Christ "is the Truth, the Way and the Life"?

Please tell us where Paul preached the "Egyptian god of the dead resurrection"?

[link to www.justgivemethetruth.com]

The Apostle Paul Was A Deceiver!

He was Satan In The Flesh! An Antichrist!

Matthew 24:4-5 states you will be deceived by people that come using Jesus’ name. Consider the parable of the sower. Jesus was warning us then that as soon as His Gospel was preached, the enemy (Paul) would be there to steal the truth!


***The real (untranslated) name of Jesus is Y'hoshua (pronounced like the name Joshua but with a Y, YoHoshua, some pronounce his name as Yeshua). All refer to the Son of God who came as the promised Messiah who died on the cross for our sins and rose again.

Now before you throw a tantrum and wonder why I haven't been struck by lightening straight from the throne room of God, I can prove to you that Paul was a Fraud using his own words. Of course, if you're a female, and you're in the ministry, you already know he was, you probably just didn't realize it! For to be a female and in the ministry of the Lord, you had to turn your back on Paul to follow Jesus. Congrats! You figured it out! You refused to buy into the lie pie Satan tried to sell you as Paul!

I'm going to make some startling points to wake your mind up into the truth, so hear me out, then I'll go through and explain each one and give you all the proof you need to see for yourself that what I'm saying is indeed the truth.

Paul was Satan in the Flesh

Paul was never recognized as an apostle by the Disciples OR Jesus

Paul was never trained by the disciples, the men who walked, talked, and broke bread with our Saviour. He received his knowledge from "revelations."

Paul's account of his Damascus Road Experience changed every time he told it, thus the disciples knew he was lying.

Paul declared he was teaching another Gospel of which he himself was the Father

Paul declared he himself was the son of God

Paul issued his own commandments and laws for people to adhere to

Paul taught the exact Opposite of what Jesus and His real disciples did.

Paul worked to destroy and undo everything Jesus and His disciples did and were doing.

Paul was never repentant for being the greatest persecutor of Christians at that time! He boasted about it! Over and Over!

Paul said God's law was a Curse. Jesus said it was a blessing. Who's lying?

Paul condemned Jesus and His disciples for false teachings, he condemned Jesus Himself for having long hair in 1 Corinthians 11:14, something approved in Numbers 6:5 and Judges 13:5.

Jesus Said: Keep the Sabbath (Mark 2:27), circumcise male children (Luke 2:21), Paul Said: Circumcision is not necessary (Romans 2:26) that is going against what the Christ said in Luke 2:21.

In 1 Corinthians 15:1 Paul says that he was not giving them anything but what “he preached.” He explained this even further in the second book (or letter) to the Corinthians (2 Corinthians 11:17). It reads - “That which I speak, I speak it not after the Lord, but as it were foolishly, in this confidence of boasting.” He's telling you plain and simple he was speaking of himself and not from or of the Lord!"

Paul cursed Jesus and His disciples

Paul claimed he himself was the son of God

Paul Supported and demanded Adherence to Iniquity (Discrimination), Jesus said to not let it be found among us! Who's lying?

I would say your manner and that of the other anti-Paulians is as if the matter of Paul has been firmly dealt with by "the better informed less clouded minds" and all that remains is to post the denunciations and link to the sites where the "better-informed" post the same [to me baffling] accusations over and over, and then sit back and collect your accolades from others who "just had a bad feeling" too about Paul and "thank you sooo much for the "facts" about Paul, and for your incredible bravery in posting them!"
Tit for tat I suppose is fair but maybe I should remind you I was speaking in the context of you and ATG essentially hijacking the thread off topic.

I'll re-post the links I suggested if need be since you obviously never read either because your statements based on them are patently untrue. They contain similar charges as stated here but along with heaping portions of Bible Old and New Testament quotations and references. jesuswordsonly.com breaks down almost all of Paul's books in detail to substantiate the charges. Seek and ye shall find.

Maybe in your own mind we truly are collecting accolades but suspect this is just more smoke from you since that "incredible bravery" bit is pure fabrication.


I really don't know how to respond to this. You seem to be addressing Alexander the Great's position , not mine. I've been quoting scripture to show that the law covenant is no longer in effect. Were you trying to grant me a concession by stating something you know I agree with? If so ,I'm sorry I interpreted it as a lecture, on something of which you maybe want readers to infer I'm guilty .

It applies to your "Why is it minutia?" question and your misplaced view of its relevance in the larger picture. It's not about about you, ATG or me and I have no intention of being further sidetracked by it at this time.



Then you should be delighted I mostly posted Paul's writings so readers can see for themselves, as you believe they will, ""his inflammatory highly convoluted doublespeak.""

It's fascinating to me what you defenders of Paul choose to leave out when coming to his aid with Bible quotes. Perhaps I'll highlight a few prime examples down the road if I run into someone who is actually trying to grasp the truth. Which so far it doesn't seem to include you


I grant you "clarified" in connection with Paul probably sounds crazy to most ppl. But he does clarify the matter for me, beautifully, and I'm definitely not alone in feeling that way about it, and in being very grateful to God for all scripture.

It doesn't sound crazy it is crazy when two people with the same words in front of them end up with polarized positions arguing endlessly. That is only a sample of Paul's magic spell. But still you somehow don't see it.

You tell me.

I don't read Paul. I used to know, though.

Michael

You forgot to specify his most important lie: He taught the Egyptian 'god of the dead'-Pharisaical ("synagogue of Satan") doctrine of the physical raising of a dead body from the grave, in opposition to the Revelation of "the resurrection" consisting of the Revelation of the Memory of Creation and the revelation of the memories of previous lives.

It was that lie that led directly to the Holocaust.

Michael

According to Josephus the ""Pharisaical ("synagogue of Satan") doctrine""[<quoting 4Q529] was reincarnation.

"The Jewish Pharisees said that “the souls of good men only are removed into other bodies”?" (Wars of the Jews, Josephus, Book II, chap. VIII, par. 14)

..no evidence?

According to Josephus the ""Pharisaical ("synagogue of Satan") doctrine""[<quoting 4Q529] was reincarnation.

"The Jewish Pharisees said that “the souls of good men only are removed into other bodies”?" (Wars of the Jews, Josephus, Book II, chap. VIII, par. 14)

OK OK

I Corinthians 15:35-53.

The only real difference between this body and the body that is 'raised from the dead', according to Paul, is that the body that is 'raised from the dead' is imperishable; i.e., has eternal life.

There is NO such doctrine in either the Torah or the Prophets or the Teaching of Jesus.

What happened to the body of Lazarus?

He died.

What happened to the body of the daughter of Jairus?

She died.

Michael

Look for my replies in red

The resurrection bodies are imperishable.

I have heard it has been proven Paul didn't write book of Hebrews.

This is patently false and relies upon an insufficiently nuanced reading of Josephus, who reports Jewish beliefs in Greek terms for the benefit of his Gentile readers. Josephus says that the Pharisees believe that "the souls of good men only are removed into other bodies, but that the souls of bad men are subject to eternal punishment." (War 2.164) Not only is this contrary to reincarnation principles (as it undermines the idea of karma: bad men do not get another body of a lower form), it misunderstands "other bodies" -- which is a reference to the resurrection body.

Tell me where it states this in the Torah; which is where Jesus said the Sadducees should find the answer to their question.

Michael

Why do you lean on the Torah exclusivly? Cherry picking?

“But your dead will live; their bodies will rise. You who dwell in the dust wake up and shout for joy. Your dew is like the dew of the morning; the earth will give birth to her dead” (Isa. 26:19)....

This is the best thing I've read about the law of karma and has formed my understanding of it.

"Amoral, Senseless and Hopeless.

Since reincarnation is a belief basic to witchcraft, it is not surprising that it is amoral. Instead of solving the problem of evil, it perpetuates it. If a husband beats his wife, the cause-and-effect law of karma decrees that he must be reincarnated as a wife who is beaten by her husband. That husband (who will have been prepared by his karma to be a wife beater) will in turn have to come back as a wife beaten by her husband, and so forth endlessly. The perpetrator of each crime must become the victim of the same crime, which necessitates another perpetrator, who in turn must become a subsequent victim at the hands of another ad infinitum, ad absurdum. Rather than solving the problem of evil, karma and reincarnation perpetuate it. Think of the evil that must yet be perpetrated upon future reincarnations of Hitler…"

Alan: And we add all the rest to that too, Stalin and all the rest of them.

"…in order to pay for his crimes! With few alleged exceptions, the average person has no recollection of the many past lives that he or she has supposedly lived. Without any memory of previous mistakes and lessons learned, what is the point of living again and again only to bear the burden of bad karma and the dire consequences of deeds one cannot remember? It's argued that subconsciously we have such memories (which can be induced and dealt with through hypnotherapy) and are thus benefiting at an unconscious level. If that were true, we should see evidence that humans individually and collectively, are living better more divine lives. That is patently not the case. Reincarnation is thus a senseless philosophy.

That reincarnation is also hopeless follows logically. The karma built up in the present life must be worked off in a future reincarnation. But in the process of working it off, more karma is accumulated, which must in turn be worked off in the next life and so forth endlessly. This is why the Hindu speaks of the wheel of reincarnation and why Gandhi called reincarnation "a burden too great to bear." There's no release; it goes on forever. Yoga was developed as a means of escape from this endless wheel of death and rebirth, but whether it actually is or not must be taken by faith. And faith and efficacy of amoral and senseless laws whose existence is not supported by the facts but appear to be misplaced." [link to cuttingthroughthematrix.com]