Notes from an "alternate universe". Introduction to a new way of thinking. | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1076712 Canada 03/19/2012 01:55 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Dagdha User ID: 12780030 United Kingdom 03/19/2012 02:16 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 12730479 Germany 03/19/2012 02:24 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1204937 Canada 03/19/2012 02:25 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I am too lazy to scroll back to the posts relating to earthquakes. He mentioned th importance of 19.5 degrees - Washington DC, New Madrid, San Francisco. He also suggested we need to look at the relevance of pi and phi. (Phi/pi) x 365 = 188. Thus the 188 day major earthquake cycle. the next 188 day event should be on or about March 22nd. |
Dagdha User ID: 12780030 United Kingdom 03/19/2012 02:32 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I am too lazy to scroll back to the posts relating to earthquakes. He mentioned th importance of 19.5 degrees - Washington DC, New Madrid, San Francisco. He also suggested we need to look at the relevance of pi and phi. (Phi/pi) x 365 = 188. Thus the 188 day major earthquake cycle. the next 188 day event should be on or about March 22nd. Ah! I get you now. Very observant. |
Dagdha User ID: 12780030 United Kingdom 03/19/2012 02:41 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1204937 Canada 03/19/2012 02:58 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Also: 39.1 on Earth /2 = 19.5 on Sol [reference 'hyperdimensional physics'] Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1518400 Chaol If some people are wondering why some earthquakes are appearing at 37 degrees North latitude, it is because it just happens to be the first position where certain relationships are illustrated geophysically. Quoting: Chaol Ecsys prime / pi = 39.1 39.1 + phi = 40.7 39.1 - phi = 37.5 Ecsys prime (123), pi (3.1415), phi (1.618) I am unable to explain why X prime, pi, or phi are important. However, the enterprising mind may be able to figure it out as long as they remember that everything in perception has physical values (including numbers). I can only find references to earthquakes at around 37 degrees, back in posts last August Quoting: Dagdha You are correct. 19.5 for the sun and 39.1 for the earth. Good eye!! |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 12730479 Germany 03/19/2012 03:09 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I am too lazy to scroll back to the posts relating to earthquakes. He mentioned th importance of 19.5 degrees - Washington DC, New Madrid, San Francisco. He also suggested we need to look at the relevance of pi and phi. (Phi/pi) x 365 = 188. Thus the 188 day major earthquake cycle. the next 188 day event should be on or about March 22nd. Thanks, I too did remember only the 37 degrees reference. Seems this guy is on to something then: Thread: The 188 day cycle DECODED...this is HUGE!! |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1204937 Canada 03/19/2012 03:14 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I am too lazy to scroll back to the posts relating to earthquakes. He mentioned th importance of 19.5 degrees - Washington DC, New Madrid, San Francisco. He also suggested we need to look at the relevance of pi and phi. (Phi/pi) x 365 = 188. Thus the 188 day major earthquake cycle. the next 188 day event should be on or about March 22nd. Thanks, I too did remember only the 37 degrees reference. Seems this guy is on to something then: Thread: The 188 day cycle DECODED...this is HUGE!! yes he is the one that led to the relationship between phi and pi. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 12787722 Brazil 03/19/2012 04:33 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Did you guys know this site: [link to recordofawakening.com] ? I've always thought that Chaol and Open (oct282011.com creator), speak about the same thing... It's really interesting. Now you guys started to talk about pi in the same time that the people at recordofawakening started too! It's too much coincidences... |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1204937 Canada 03/19/2012 05:38 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Did you guys know this site: [link to recordofawakening.com] ? Quoting: Gespenst I've always thought that Chaol and Open (oct282011.com creator), speak about the same thing... It's really interesting. Now you guys started to talk about pi in the same time that the people at recordofawakening started too! It's too much coincidences... I asked Chaol about this site. He claimed he had nothing to do with it directly. You'd have to search the thread for his exact response. I followed the oct282011 site for a while, but to be honest, it seems like a path to nowhere. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 2573527 Italy 03/19/2012 08:32 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Did you guys know this site: [link to recordofawakening.com] ? Quoting: Gespenst I've always thought that Chaol and Open (oct282011.com creator), speak about the same thing... It's really interesting. Now you guys started to talk about pi in the same time that the people at recordofawakening started too! It's too much coincidences... I asked Chaol about this site. He claimed he had nothing to do with it directly. You'd have to search the thread for his exact response. I followed the oct282011 site for a while, but to be honest, it seems like a path to nowhere. I have asked Open via email and he said the same thing... I think that "Record" was the most important thing that came from oct282011. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 5877556 Canada 03/19/2012 11:00 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Did you guys know this site: [link to recordofawakening.com] ? Quoting: Gespenst I've always thought that Chaol and Open (oct282011.com creator), speak about the same thing... It's really interesting. Now you guys started to talk about pi in the same time that the people at recordofawakening started too! It's too much coincidences... I asked Chaol about this site. He claimed he had nothing to do with it directly. You'd have to search the thread for his exact response. I followed the oct282011 site for a while, but to be honest, it seems like a path to nowhere. I have asked Open via email and he said the same thing... I think that "Record" was the most important thing that came from oct282011. Ok we have started to revive this once great thread. Let's keep this rolling. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1204937 Canada 03/20/2012 03:39 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Did you guys know this site: [link to recordofawakening.com] ? Quoting: Gespenst I've always thought that Chaol and Open (oct282011.com creator), speak about the same thing... It's really interesting. Now you guys started to talk about pi in the same time that the people at recordofawakening started too! It's too much coincidences... I asked Chaol about this site. He claimed he had nothing to do with it directly. You'd have to search the thread for his exact response. I followed the oct282011 site for a while, but to be honest, it seems like a path to nowhere. I have asked Open via email and he said the same thing... I think that "Record" was the most important thing that came from oct282011. Ok we have started to revive this once great thread. Let's keep this rolling. sheesh - you all left |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 3402675 Italy 03/20/2012 04:19 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1204937 I asked Chaol about this site. He claimed he had nothing to do with it directly. You'd have to search the thread for his exact response. I followed the oct282011 site for a while, but to be honest, it seems like a path to nowhere. I have asked Open via email and he said the same thing... I think that "Record" was the most important thing that came from oct282011. Ok we have started to revive this once great thread. Let's keep this rolling. sheesh - you all left I'm here! |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 12850892 Germany 03/20/2012 04:44 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Gespenst I have asked Open via email and he said the same thing... I think that "Record" was the most important thing that came from oct282011. Ok we have started to revive this once great thread. Let's keep this rolling. sheesh - you all left I'm here! We don't leave. We just don't post all the time. |
MutantMessiah User ID: 4191826 United States 03/20/2012 05:43 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 5877556 Ok we have started to revive this once great thread. Let's keep this rolling. sheesh - you all left I'm here! We don't leave. We just don't post all the time. Troof Consider the possibility that you order yourself into being from chaos... You do this, always, in all ways. This "ordering" has resulted in the possibilities you're experiencing, here, now. In each experience you've ever had, more and more of "this" reality is generated logically from your previous experience. Your observation of this unfolding of order and chaos is reality. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1562550 United States 03/20/2012 06:10 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I am too lazy to scroll back to the posts relating to earthquakes. He mentioned th importance of 19.5 degrees - Washington DC, New Madrid, San Francisco. He also suggested we need to look at the relevance of pi and phi. (Phi/pi) x 365 = 188. Thus the 188 day major earthquake cycle. the next 188 day event should be on or about March 22nd. 7.6 in Mexico today (about 4 hours ago). Two days early and I don't believe that is on the 19.5 but I suck at this geography stuff. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 12850892 Germany 03/20/2012 07:00 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I am too lazy to scroll back to the posts relating to earthquakes. He mentioned th importance of 19.5 degrees - Washington DC, New Madrid, San Francisco. He also suggested we need to look at the relevance of pi and phi. (Phi/pi) x 365 = 188. Thus the 188 day major earthquake cycle. the next 188 day event should be on or about March 22nd. 7.6 in Mexico today (about 4 hours ago). Two days early and I don't believe that is on the 19.5 but I suck at this geography stuff. MAP 5.0 2012/03/20 22:25:43 16.449 -98.657 21.3 GUERRERO, MEXICO MAP 4.6 2012/03/20 21:43:41 16.438 -98.300 20.9 OAXACA, MEXICO MAP 5.1 2012/03/20 20:14:38 16.410 -98.106 10.9 OAXACA, MEXICO MAP 4.8 2012/03/20 19:34:12 16.359 -98.155 18.7 OAXACA, MEXICO MAP 4.7 2012/03/20 19:19:52 16.151 -98.308 13.1 OFFSHORE OAXACA, MEXICO MAP 5.1 2012/03/20 19:02:45 16.383 -98.333 25.9 OAXACA, MEXICO MAP 5.1 2012/03/20 18:35:40 16.527 -98.100 10.1 OAXACA, MEXICO MAP 5.3 2012/03/20 18:22:35 16.298 -98.183 18.0 OAXACA, MEXICO MAP 7.4 2012/03/20 18:02:49 16.662 -98.188 20.0 OAXACA, MEXICO Between 16.1 and 16.5. 3 degrees difference. |
miqq User ID: 3535235 Argentina 03/20/2012 08:31 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I am too lazy to scroll back to the posts relating to earthquakes. He mentioned th importance of 19.5 degrees - Washington DC, New Madrid, San Francisco. He also suggested we need to look at the relevance of pi and phi. (Phi/pi) x 365 = 188. Thus the 188 day major earthquake cycle. the next 188 day event should be on or about March 22nd. 7.6 in Mexico today (about 4 hours ago). Two days early and I don't believe that is on the 19.5 but I suck at this geography stuff. MAP 5.0 2012/03/20 22:25:43 16.449 -98.657 21.3 GUERRERO, MEXICO MAP 4.6 2012/03/20 21:43:41 16.438 -98.300 20.9 OAXACA, MEXICO MAP 5.1 2012/03/20 20:14:38 16.410 -98.106 10.9 OAXACA, MEXICO MAP 4.8 2012/03/20 19:34:12 16.359 -98.155 18.7 OAXACA, MEXICO MAP 4.7 2012/03/20 19:19:52 16.151 -98.308 13.1 OFFSHORE OAXACA, MEXICO MAP 5.1 2012/03/20 19:02:45 16.383 -98.333 25.9 OAXACA, MEXICO MAP 5.1 2012/03/20 18:35:40 16.527 -98.100 10.1 OAXACA, MEXICO MAP 5.3 2012/03/20 18:22:35 16.298 -98.183 18.0 OAXACA, MEXICO MAP 7.4 2012/03/20 18:02:49 16.662 -98.188 20.0 OAXACA, MEXICO Between 16.1 and 16.5. 3 degrees difference. Well, that's not close, but, what if those are the first ones |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1144326 United States 03/21/2012 02:29 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1204937 Canada 03/21/2012 11:36 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 3389881 Italy 03/22/2012 02:56 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | About pi: [link to www.aloha.net] |
MaJorMan User ID: 1486085 United States 03/22/2012 09:15 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Another clue: Quoting: Anonymous Coward 12599045 Turn a sheet of paper on its diagnal and imagine is as a baseball diamond with each corner as a base. Now look at the sheet from the viewpoint of third base...only look at it from the very thin sliver edge so that the paper is parralell to your line of vision...you can not see the front or back..only the sliver edge. Now imagine that someone was standing on third base. To you it would look like a dot in the middle of a line. Imagine that someone was also standing at 1st base. You would not see him because the 3d base runner blocks your view. But if one ran to second and the other homeplate...you would suddenly see two dots appear and moving in oppisite directions to the endpoints of a line from the middle. It would seem strange to you. How did one dot become two? How did they coexist in the same spot at the same time? The reason you cant figure it out is because your only seeing it one dimensionally. If you look at it two dimensionally its easy to see...look at the paper from above and the line becomes a plane ...and the runners are seen at first and 3rd. This why quantum mechanics looks so wierd to us...we are only thinking of things in terms of one dimension! look at this dot----> . on this 2d screen its just 1 dot. But how do know that theres not another dot behind it in 3d? the 2d screen doesnt revealt that information. Or better yet...when we see things, how do we know that its the same thing everytime. From 1d a runner at 3rd will look just like a runner at 1st...yet they are not the same. but they appear to be in the exact same spot on our line. Without the extra-dimensional view, we cant be sure. Let me give an example: Remember metatrons cube? It drew a 3d object on a 2d paper. Well...in 2d, the lines dont appear to all be the same length...the inner cube perimeter is shorter than the outer cube perimeter...but look at it again, only this time,imagine depth...so that the inner cube is merely the "back wall" of the outer cubes "Front wall". If we could measure that in 3d, all sides would be equal length...but on 2d paper they are not. Now lets envision a circle with a line throught it (a diameter) What if thats not a line...what if its an arc...but just like the paper/baseball diamond...we are only viewing it from the razor edge? What if it was merely a half circle standing upright. We cant see that in 2d...but we could in 3d. Better yet...what if pi was really 3. or 2...or if theres a mirrored arc behind it as well...even 1! It gets even wierder than that.... |
MutantMessiah User ID: 3045646 United States 03/22/2012 04:18 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Another clue: Quoting: Anonymous Coward 12599045 Turn a sheet of paper on its diagnal and imagine is as a baseball diamond with each corner as a base. Now look at the sheet from the viewpoint of third base...only look at it from the very thin sliver edge so that the paper is parralell to your line of vision...you can not see the front or back..only the sliver edge. Now imagine that someone was standing on third base. To you it would look like a dot in the middle of a line. Imagine that someone was also standing at 1st base. You would not see him because the 3d base runner blocks your view. But if one ran to second and the other homeplate...you would suddenly see two dots appear and moving in oppisite directions to the endpoints of a line from the middle. It would seem strange to you. How did one dot become two? How did they coexist in the same spot at the same time? The reason you cant figure it out is because your only seeing it one dimensionally. If you look at it two dimensionally its easy to see...look at the paper from above and the line becomes a plane ...and the runners are seen at first and 3rd. This why quantum mechanics looks so wierd to us...we are only thinking of things in terms of one dimension! look at this dot----> . on this 2d screen its just 1 dot. But how do know that theres not another dot behind it in 3d? the 2d screen doesnt revealt that information. Or better yet...when we see things, how do we know that its the same thing everytime. From 1d a runner at 3rd will look just like a runner at 1st...yet they are not the same. but they appear to be in the exact same spot on our line. Without the extra-dimensional view, we cant be sure. Let me give an example: Remember metatrons cube? It drew a 3d object on a 2d paper. Well...in 2d, the lines dont appear to all be the same length...the inner cube perimeter is shorter than the outer cube perimeter...but look at it again, only this time,imagine depth...so that the inner cube is merely the "back wall" of the outer cubes "Front wall". If we could measure that in 3d, all sides would be equal length...but on 2d paper they are not. Now lets envision a circle with a line throught it (a diameter) What if thats not a line...what if its an arc...but just like the paper/baseball diamond...we are only viewing it from the razor edge? What if it was merely a half circle standing upright. We cant see that in 2d...but we could in 3d. Better yet...what if pi was really 3. or 2...or if theres a mirrored arc behind it as well...even 1! It gets even wierder than that.... Consider the possibility that you order yourself into being from chaos... You do this, always, in all ways. This "ordering" has resulted in the possibilities you're experiencing, here, now. In each experience you've ever had, more and more of "this" reality is generated logically from your previous experience. Your observation of this unfolding of order and chaos is reality. |
SpawnX User ID: 9519706 United States 03/22/2012 10:18 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Time to wake up! Last Edited by SpawnX on 03/22/2012 10:35 PM |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 5877556 Canada 03/24/2012 10:23 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 3389881 Italy 03/25/2012 02:43 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 13140556 Germany 03/25/2012 07:33 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 13177768 United States 03/25/2012 07:47 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | you are from one of the many programs being simulated in our vitual galaxy and have a specific purpose, that is to play out the program with very minor varients ,has your technology been able to duplicate a mini virtual reality?? do you have singularity yet.?????/ |